Skip to main content

Nearly Bounded Error Probabilistic Sets

Extended Abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2653))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

We study polynomial-time randomized algorithms that solve problems on “most” inputs with “small” error probability. The sets that have such algorithms are called nearly BPP sets, which naturally expand BPP sets. Notably, sparse sets and average BPP sets are typical examples of nearly BPP sets. It is, however, open whether all NP sets are nearly BPP. The nearly BPP sets can be captured by Nisan-Wigderson’s approximation scheme as well as viewed as a special case of promise BPP problems. Moreover, nearly BPP sets are precisely described in terms of Sipser’s distinguishing complexity. These sets have a connection to average-case complexity and cryptography. Nevertheless, unlike BPP, the class of nearly BPP sets is not closed even under honest polynomial-time one-one reductions. In this paper, we study a more general notion of nearly \( {\text{BP}}\left[ \mathcal{C} \right] \) sets, analogous to Schöning’s probabilistic class \( {\text{BP}}\left[ \mathcal{C} \right] \) for any complexity class \( \mathcal{C} \) . The “infinitely-often” version of nearly BPP sets shows a direct connection to cryptographic one-way partial functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Aida and T. Tsukiji, P-comp versus P-samp questions on average polynomial domination. IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst., E84-D (2001), 1402–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Babai, L. Fortnow, N. Nisan, and A. Wigderson, BPP has subexponential time simulation unless EXPTIME has publishable proofs, Comput. Complexity, 3 (1993), 307–318.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Buhrman and L. Fortnow, One-sided versus two-sided error in probabilistic computation, Proc. 16th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1563, pp. 100–109, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Buhrman, L. Fortnow, and S. Laplante, Resource-bounded Kolmogorov complexity revisited, SIAM J. Comput., 31 (2002), 887–905.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Buhrman and L. Torenvliet, Randomness is hard, SIAM J. Comput., 30 (2000), 1485–1501.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Even, A. Selman, and Y. Yacobi, The complexity of promise problems with applications to public-key cryptography, Inform. and Control, 61 (1984), 159–173.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Even and Y. Yacobi, Cryptocomplexity and NP-completeness, in Proc. 7th Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 85, pp. 195–207, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Feigenbaum and L. Fortnow, Random-self-reducibility of complete sets, SIAM J. Comput., 22 (1993), 994–1005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Feigenbaum, S. Kannan, and N. Nisan, Lower bounds on random-self-reducibility, in Proc. 5th Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pp. 100–109, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Gurevich, Average case complexity, J. Comput. System Sci., 42 (1991), 346–398.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. M. Karp and R. Lipton, Turing machines that take advice, L’enseigment Mathematique, 28 (1982), 191–209.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Lautemann, BPP and the polynomial hierarchy, Inform. Process. Lett., 17 (1983), 215–217.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. L. A. Levin, Average case complete problems, SIAM J. Comput., 15 (1986), 285–286.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Li and P. Vitányi, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications (second edition), Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Meyer and L. Stockmeyer, The equivalence problem for regular expressions with squaring requires exponential space, in Proc. 13th Symposium on Switching and Automata, pp. 125–129, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Nisan and A. Wigderson, Hardness vs. randomness, J. Comput. System Sci., 49 (1994), 149–167.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Schindelhauer and A. Jakoby, The non-recursive power of erroneous computation, in Proc. 19th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 394–406, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. U. Schöning, Probabilistic complexity classes and lowness, J. Comput. System Sci., 39 (1989), 84–100.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Schuler and T. Yamakami, Sets computable in polynomial time on average, in Proc. 1st International Computing and Combinatorics Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 959, pp. 400–409, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Sipser, A complexity theoretic approach to randomness, in Proc. 15th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 330–335, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Yamakami, Polynomial time samplable distributions, J. Complexity, 15 (1999), 557–574. A preliminary version appeared in Proc. 21th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1113, pp. 566–578, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Yamakami, Average Case Complexity Theory, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1997. Available as Technical Report 307/97, University of Toronto. Also available at ECCC Thesis Listings.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Zuckerman, Randomness-optimal sampling, extractors, and constructive leader election, in Proc. 28th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 286–295, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yamakami, T. (2003). Nearly Bounded Error Probabilistic Sets. In: Petreschi, R., Persiano, G., Silvestri, R. (eds) Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2653. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44849-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44849-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40176-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44849-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics