Advertisement

Concept Based Image Retrieval Using the Domain Ontology

  • Wonpil Kim
  • Hyunjang Kong
  • Kunseok Oh
  • Yoojin Moon
  • Pankoo Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2668)

Abstract

The recent study has been progressed the research about more semantic image indexing and retrieval. In our paper, we represent the improved concept-based image retrieval by using domain ontology. We analyze the many studies that applied the theory of ontology to concept-based image retrieval. Then, we try to solve the problems when we apply the huge ontologies in image retrieval system. There are two big problems. First, the huge ontologies that have many concepts, is out of date and changed the meaning. Secondly, the many new concepts, especially in particular domain, cannot express in existing ontologies. Therefore, in this paper we try to design and implement the domain ontology about the car based on the WordNet, which is one kinds of ontologies. The experimental result shows that the semantic distances between words are quite close when we test domain ontology than the existing WordNet.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. B. Benitez and J. R. Smith, “New Frontiers for Intelligent System”, Proceeding of the IS&T/SPIE 2001 Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Media Databases, Vol. 4315, San Jose, CA, Jan.24–26, 2001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Jaimes and S.-F. Chang, Concepts and Techniques for Indexing Visual Semantics, Book Chapter in “ Image Databases, Search and Retrieval of Digital Imagery”, edited by V. Cas-telli and L. Bergman.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. B. Benitez, S.-F. Chang, and J. R. Smith, IMKA: A Multimedia Organization System Combining Perceptual and Semantic Knowledge, Proceeding of the 9th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM-2001), Canada, Ottawa, Sep 30-Oct 5, 2001Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Jorgensen, A. Jaimes, A. B. Benitez, and S.-F. Chang, A Conceptual Framework and Research for Classifying Visual Descriptors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), Invited Paper on Special Issue on Image Access: Bridging Multiple Needs and Multiple Perspectives, Sep 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robert MacGregor & Ramesh S. Patil, Tools for Assembling and Managing Scalable Knowledge Bases, CA 90292Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y.C. Park, P.K. Kim, F. Golshani, S. Panchanathan, “Conceptualization and ontology: tools for efficient storage and retrieval of semantic visual information”, Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Internet Multimedia Management Systems, Nov. 6–7, 2000, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Panchanathan; Y. Park, K. Kim; P. Kim, F. Golshani, “The Role of Color in Content based Image Retrieval”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10–13, 2000, Vancouvour, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alejandro Jaimes and Shih-Fu Chang, “A Conceptual Framework for Indexing Visual Information at Multiple Levels”, Internet Imaging 2000, IS&T/SPIE. San Jose, CA, January 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.; and Luke, S. 1999. SHOE: A Knowledge Representation Language for Internet Application, Technical Report, CS-TR-4078(UMIACS TR-99-71), Dept. of Computer Science, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Grosky, P. Stanchev, “An Image Data Model”, in Advances in Visual Information System, R. Laurini(edt.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1929, pp.14–25, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ted Pedersen, Siddharth Patwardhan, “Semantic Distance Measure Version 0.11”, University of Minnesota, Duluth.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    George A. Miller “Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database”, International Journal of Lexicography, 1990.13. K Barnard, D.A. Forsyth. “Learning the semantics of words and pictures” In int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y.C. Park, P.K. Kim, F Golshani, S Panchanathan “Concept-based visual information management with large lexical corpus” DEXA, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    K Barnard, P Duygulg, J.F.G. de Freitas, D.A. Forsyth Object Recognition as Machine Translation: Learning a Lexicon for a Fixed Image vocabulary, Seventh European Conference on Computer Vision, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Richardson, A.F. Smeaton Using WordNet in a Knowlwdge-Based Approach to Information Retrieval, Working paper, CA-0395, School of Computer Applications, Dublin City University, Ireland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wonpil Kim
    • 1
  • Hyunjang Kong
    • 1
  • Kunseok Oh
    • 2
  • Yoojin Moon
    • 3
  • Pankoo Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer Science and EngineeringChosun UniversityGwangjuKorea
  2. 2.Kwangju Health CollegeGwangjuKorea
  3. 3.Hankuk Univ. of Foreign StudiesSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations