Advertisement

The Integrated Corporate Information Network iCoIN: A Comprehensive, Web-Based Experience Factory

  • Björn Decker
  • Andreas Jedlitschka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2176)

Abstract

During execution of projects, Software Organizations gain experience in their business. However, timely, effective and efficient reuse of this experience in subsequent projects is often problematic. The concept of an Experience Factory (EF), an infrastructure for continuous learning from experience, was designed to tackle these problems in the software development business. To install such an EF at the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), the knowledge management initiative Corporate Information Network (CoIN) was started in 1999. This paper presents the vision for CoIN and the practical experiences gained in its business process modeling part.

Keywords

Business Process Knowledge Management Structure Text Process Execution Business Process Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Althoff, K.-D.; Birk, A.; Hartkopf, S.; Müller, W.; Nick, M.; Surmann, D. Tautz, C.: Managing Software Engineering Experience for Comprehensive Reuse; Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany, June 1999; Knowledge Systems Institute; Skokie, Illinois, USA; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Althoff, K.-D.; Bomarius, F.; Tautz, C.: Knowledge Management for Building Learning Software Organizations, Information Systems Frontiers; p. 349–367; Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Basili, V.R.; Caldiera, G.; Rombach, D.: Experience Factory; In Marciniak, J.J. ed., Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, vol 1, 469–476; John Wiley & Sons; 1994.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bröckers, A.; Lott, C.M.; Rombach, H. D.: Verlage, M.: MVP-L Language Report Version 2; Technical Report University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Computer Science 265 / 95; 1995Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Basili, V.R.; Rombach, H.D.: Support for Comprehensive Reuse, Software Engineering Journal, September 1991Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Birk, A.; Tautz, C.: Knowledge Management of Software Engineering Lessons Learned; Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering; San Francisco Bay; USA. Skokie, Illinois, USA: Knowledge Systems Institute; 1998.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Becker-Kornstaedt, U.; Verlage, M.: The V-Model Guide: Experience with a Web-based Approach for Process Support; Proceedings of Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP); 1999.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Curtis, B.; Kellner, M. I., Over, J.: Process Modeling; Communications of the ACM; 1992.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Decker, B.; Althoff, K.-D.; Nick, M.; Tautz, C.: Integrating Business Process Descriptions and Lessons Learned with an Experience Factory; 1st Workshop on business-process-oriented knowledge Management, http://SunSITE.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE/Publications/CEURWS/ Vol-37/Decker.pdf, 2001
  10. [10]
    Dilg, P.: Praktisches Qualitätsmanagement in der Informationstechnologie; Carl Hanser Verlag, Wien; 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Griss M.L.; Software reuse: From library to factory. IBM Systems Journal, 32(4):548–566, November 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Maurer, F.; Holz, H.: Process-Oriented Knowledge Management For Learning Software Organizations, Proceedings of 12th Knowledge Acquisition For Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop 1999 (KAW99); Canada, Banff; 1999.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Nick, M; Althoff, K.-D.; Tautz, C.: Systematic maintenance of corporate experience repositories; Computational Intelligence special issue on maintaining CBR systems, 2000 (to appear).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Nielsen, Jakob, http://www.useit.com/alertbox, 2001.
  15. [15]
    Duncan, W. R. (Director of Standards): A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge; Project Management Institute; PMI Publishing Division; North Carolina, USA; http://www.pmi.org/publictn/download/1996welcome.html; 1996.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Solingen, R. v.; Berghout, E.: The Goal/Questions/Metric Method; Mc Graw Hill Publishing Company;1999.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Scheer, A.W.: Referenzmodelle für industrielle Geschäftsprozesse (siebte Auflage), Springer Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Schindler, M., Seifried, P.: Projekte und Prozesse im Kontext des Wissensmanagement, Industrie Management 15 p.20–25; GITO-Verlag; 1999.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Spearmint/EPG homepage, http://www.iese.fhg.de/Spearmint/index.html, 2001.
  20. [20]
    Tautz, C.: Customizing Software Engineering Experience Management Systems to Organizational Needs; Ph. D. diss., Dept. of Computer Science, University of K aiserslautern, Germany; 2000.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Osterweil, L.: Software Processes Are Software Too, Association for Computer Machinery (ACM); 1987Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Nonaka, Ikujori. The knowledge-creating company, in Harvard Business Review, November-December 1991Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Workflow Management Facility Specification, V1.2, Object Management Group; http://www.omg.org/, 2000

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Decker
    • 1
  • Andreas Jedlitschka
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software EngineeringKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations