Advertisement

Process-Integrated Learning: The ADVISOR Approach for Corporate Development

  • Philipp Starkloff
  • Katja Pook
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2176)

Abstract

This paper highlights ideas and experiences of the ADVISOR approach to increase process awareness among employees. ADVanced Instruction Technologies for Services ORganisations aim to look at learning and training from a process point of view. Whereas training is often somewhat detached from daily business here knowledge and skill acquisition within the business processes is emphasised. A front-end information system was built with a business process management software toolkit by adapting the toolkit to the needs of e-learning and knowledge management. Employees are presented customised views on process chains which are enriched with target specific information and learning objects. It is argued that ADVISOR can substantially support the introduction of new software and other change projects in an organisation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zucchermaglio, C., S. Bagnara, et al., (eds.): Organizational Learning and Technological Change. NATO ASI Series F. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heisig, P.: Business Oriented Knowledge Management-Methode zur Verknüpfung von Wissensmanagement und Geschäftsprozessgestaltung. WM 2001. Electronic publication, Baden-Baden, Germany (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Junginger, S., Kühn, H., Strobl, R., Karagiannis, D.: Ein Geschäftsprozess-management-Werkzeug der nächsten Generation-ADONIS: Konzeption und Anwendungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 42 (2000) 5, 392–401.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nonaka, I. amp; Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Müller-Ettrich, G.: Objektorientierte Prozessmodelle: UML einsetzen mit OOTC, VModell, Objectory. Addison Wesley Longman, Bonn Reading, MA (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wharton, C., J. Riemann, et al.: The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A practicioner’s guide. In: J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack (eds.): Usability inspection methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994) 105–140Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Zangwill, W. I. and P. B. Kantor: Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve. Management Science, 44 (1998) 7, 910–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    Ruessmann-Stoehr, C., Herrmann, D., Glaubitz, G., Klug, A., Seibt, H., Wienkamp, H. (eds.): Seminare auf dem Prüfstand: Ein Qualitaetsmanagement-System für wirtschaftspsychologische Trainings (einschliesslich zertifiziertem Beispiel-Handbuch nach ISO-9001). In: Pabst, Lengerich, (eds.): Sektion Arbeits-, Betriebs-und Organisationspsychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen. (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Süß, C., Freitag, B., Brössler, P.: Metamodeling for Web-Based Teachware Management. In: P.P Chen, D.W. Embley, J. Kouloumdijan, S.W. Liddle and J.F. Roddick: Proc. Intl. WWWCM’99, Paris. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Starkloff
    • 1
  • Katja Pook
    • 2
  1. 1.b-educated! GmbH Business Education SolutionsHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelberg

Personalised recommendations