Skip to main content

Improving the Performance of OLAP Queries Using Families of Statistics Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2114))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a novel approach to speeding up the evaluation of OLAP queries that return aggregates over dimensions containing hierarchies. Our approach is based on our previous version of CubiST (Cubing with Statistics Trees), which pre-computes and stores all possible aggregate views in the leaves of a statistics tree during a one-time scan of the data. However, it uses a single statistics tree to answer all possible OLAP queries. Our new version remedies this limitation by materializing a family of derived trees from the single statistics tree. Given an input query, our new query evaluation algorithm selects the smallest tree in the family which can provide the answer. Our experiments have shown drastic reductions in processing times compared with the original CubiST as well as existing ROLAP and MOLAP systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbor Systems, “Large-Scale Data Warehousing Using Hyperion Essbase OLAP Technology,” Arbor Systems, White Paper, http://www.hyperion.com/whitepapers.cfm

  2. S. Chaudhuri and U. Dayal, “An Overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology,” SIGMOD Record, 26:1, pp. 65–74, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Fu and J. Hammer, “CubiST: A New Algorithm for Improving the Performance of Adhoc OLAP Queries,” Proceedings of the ACM Third International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP), Washington, DC, pp. 72–79, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Gray, S. Chaudhuri, A. Bosworth, A. Layman, D. Reichart, M. Venkatrao, F. Pellow, and H. Pirahesh, “Data Cube: A Relational Aggregation Operator Generalizing Group-By, Cross-Tab, and Sub-Totals,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1:1, pp. 29–53, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gupta, V. Harinarayan, and D. Quass, “Aggregate-query Processing in Data Warehousing Environments,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Very Large Databases, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 358–369, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Gupta and I. Mumick, “Selection of Views to Materialize Under a Maintenance Cost Constraint,” Stanford University, Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Hammer and L. Fu, “Speeding Up Data Cube Queries with Statistics Trees,” University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Research report TR01-007, January 2001

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Labio, D. Quass, and B. Adelberg, “Physical Database Design for Data Warehouses,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Engineering, Birmingham, England, pp. 277–288, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Lee and J. Hammer, “Speeding Up Warehouse Physical Design Using A Randomized Algorithm,” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW’ 99), Heidelberg, Germany, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Lomet, ed. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering. Special Issue on Materialized Views and Data Warehousing, ed. J. Widom. 18, IEEE Computer Society, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  11. MicroStrategy Inc., “The Case For Relational OLAP,” MicroStrategy, White Paper, http://www.microstrategy.com/publications/whitepapers/Case4Rolap/

  12. P. O’Neil and D. Quass, “Improved Query Performance with Variant Indexes,” SIGMOD Record, 26:2, pp. 38–49, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 14. Oracle Corp., “Oracle Express OLAP Technology,” http://www.oracle.com/olap/

  14. Redbrick Systems, “Informix Redbrick Decision Server,” Redbrick, Los Gatos, CA, Product Overview and Data Sheet, http://www.informix.com/redbrick/

  15. W.P. Yan and P. Larson, “Eager Aggregation and Lazy Aggregation,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Very Large Databases, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 345–357, 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hammer, J., Fu, L. (2001). Improving the Performance of OLAP Queries Using Families of Statistics Trees. In: Kambayashi, Y., Winiwarter, W., Arikawa, M. (eds) Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44801-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44801-2_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42553-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44801-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics