Skip to main content

Highlight and Shading Invariant Color Image Segmentation Using Simulated Annealing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (EMMCVPR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2134))

Abstract

Color constancy in color image segmentation is an important research issue. In this paper we develop a framework, based on the Dichromatic Reflection Model for asserting the color highlight and shading invariance, and based on a Markov Random Field approach for segmentation. A given RGB image is transformed into a R’G’B’ space To remove any highlight components, and only the vector-angle component, representing color hue but not intensity, is preserved to remove shading effects. Due to the arbitrariness of vector angles for low R’G’B’ values, We perform a Monte-Carlo sensitivity analysis to determine pixel-dependent weights for the MR F segmentation. Results are presented and analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. A. Barker, and P. J. W. Rayner, “Unsupervised Image Segmentation Using Markov Random Fields,” in M. Pelillo and E. R. Hancock (ed), Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 165–178, Springer-Verlag: 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Chellappa, and A. Jain, Markov Random Fields: Theory and Application. Academic Press, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. D. Dony, and S. Haykin, “Image segmentation using a mixture of principal components representation,” IEE Proc. VISP, vol. 144, pp. 73–80, April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Trans-PAMI, Vol. 6, No. 6, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.J. Klinker, S.A. Shafer and T. Kanade, “A Physical Approach to Color Image Understanding,” Inter’l J. of Computer Vision, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 7–38, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Z. Li, “Modeling Image Analysis Problems Using Markov Random Fields,” in C.R. Rao and D.N. Shanbhag (ed), Stochastic Processes: Modeling and Simulation, Vol. 20 of Handbook of Statistics. Elsevier Science, 2000, pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y.W. Lim, and S.U. Lee, “On the color image segmentation algorithm based on the thresholding and fuzzy c-means techniques,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1235–1252, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. K. Panjwani, and G. Healey, “Markov Random Field Models for Unsupervised Segmentation of Textured Color Images,” IEEE Trans-PAMI, Vol. 17, No. 10, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. H. Park, I. D. Yun, and S.U. Lee, “Color Image Segmentation Based on 3-D Clustering: Morphological Approach,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1061–1076, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.J. Schalkoff, Pattern Recognition: Statistical, Structural and Neural Approaches. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Shafarenko, M. Petrou, and J. Kittler, “Automatic watershed segmentation of randomly textured color images,” IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, vol. 6, pp. 1530–1544, November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.A. Shafer, “Using color to separate reflection components,” TR-136, Computer Sciences Dept., University of Rochester, NY, April 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Tominaga and B. Wandell, “The standard reflectance model and illuminant estimation”, J. of Optical Society of America A, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 576–584, April 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Tominaga, “Surface Identification Using the Dichromatic Reflection Model,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 658–670, July 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Tominaga, “Color Classification of Natural Color Images,” Color Research and Application, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 230–239, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Tominaga, “Dichromatic Reflection Models for a Variety of Materials,” Color Research and Application, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 277–285, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Tominaga, “Spectral imaging by a multichannel camera,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 332–342, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Tremeau, and N. Borel, “A Region Growing and Merging Algorithm to Color Segmentation,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1191–1203, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B.A. Wandell. Foundations of Vision, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, MA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Wang, C. Sun, and H. Chao, “Color Image Segmentation and Understanding through Connected Components,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 2, pp. 1089–1093, October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Wesolkowski, M.E. Jernigan, R.D. Dony, “Global Color Image Segmentation Strategies: Euclidean Distance vs. Vector Angle,” in Y.-H. Hu, J. Larsen, E. Wilson and S. Douglas (eds.), Neural Networks for Signal Processing IX, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1999, pp. 419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Wesolkowski, Color Image Edge Detection and Segmentation: A Comparison of the Vector Angle and the Euclidean Distance Color Similarity Measures, Master’s thesis, Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Wesolkowski, S. Tominaga, and R.D. Dony, “Shading and Highlight Invariant Color Image Segmentation Using the MPC Algorithm,” SPIE Color Imaging:Device-Independent Color, Color Hardcopy, and Graphic Arts VI, San Jose, USA, January 2001, pp. 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Winkler, Image Analysis, Random Fields and Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fieguth, P., Wesolkowski, S. (2001). Highlight and Shading Invariant Color Image Segmentation Using Simulated Annealing. In: Figueiredo, M., Zerubia, J., Jain, A.K. (eds) Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. EMMCVPR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2134. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44745-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44745-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42523-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44745-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics