Skip to main content

Improved Recognition of Spectrally Mixed Land Cover Classes Using Spatial Textures and Voting Classifications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (CAIP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2124))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Regenerating forest is important to account for carbon sink. Mapping regenerating forest from satellite data is difficult because it is spectrally mixed with natural forest. This paper investigated the combined use of texture features and voting classifications to enhance recognition of these two classes. Bagging and boosting were applied on Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) and decision tree. Our results show that spatial textures improved separability. After applying voting classifications, class accuracy of decision tree increased by 5–7% and that of LVQ by approximately 3%. Substantial reduction (between 23% to 40%) of confusions between regenerating forest and natural forest were recorded. Comparatively, bagging is more consistent than boosting. An interesting observation is that even LVQ, a stable learner, was able to benefit from both voting classification algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haralick, R.M.: Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture. Proc. IEEE, 67 (1979) 786–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning, 24 (1996) 23–140

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. A Special Report of IPCC, Summary for Policymakers (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Houghton, R.A., Boone, R.D., Fruci, J.R., Hobbie, J.E., Melillo, J.M., Palm, C.A., Peterson, B.J., Shaver, G.R., Woodwell, G.M., Moore, B., Skole, D.L., Meyers, N.: The Flux of Carbon from Terrestrial Ecosystems to the Atmosphere in 1980 due to Changes in Land Use: Geographic Distribution of the Global Flux. Tellus, 39B (1987) 122–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lugo, A.E., Brown, S.: Tropical Forests as Sinks of Atmospheric Carbon. Forest Ecology and Management, 54 (1992) 239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucas, R.M., Honzak, M., Curran, P.J., Foody, G.M., Nguele, D.T.: Characterizing Tropical Forest Regeneration in Cameroon Using NOAA AVHRR Data. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21 (2000) 2831–2854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Richards, T., Gallego, J., Achard, F.: Sampling for Forest Cover Change Assessment at the Pan-Tropical Scale. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21 (2000) 1473–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Laporte, N., Justice, C., Kendall, J.: Mapping the Dense Humid Forest of Cameroon and Zaire Using AVHRR Satellite Data. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 16 (1995) 1127–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas, R.M., Honzak, M., Curran, P.J., Foody, G.M., Milne, R., Brown, T., Amaral, S.: Mapping the Regional Extent of Tropical Forest Regeneration Stages in the Brazilian Legal Amazon Using NOAA AVHRR Data. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21 (2000) 2855–2881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Townshend, J.R.G., Justice, C.O.: Spatial Variability of Images and the Monitoring of Changes in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 16 (1995) 2187–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mather, P.M., Tso, B.C.K., Koch, M.: An Evaluation of Landsat TM Spectral Data and SAR-Derived Textural Information for Lithological Discrimination in the Red Sea Hills, Sudan. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 19 (1998) 587–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruzzone, L., Conese, C., Maselli, F., Roli, F.: Multi-Source Classification of Complex Rural Areas by Statistical and Neural-Network Approaches. Photogram. Eng. & Remote Sensing, 63 (1997) 523–533

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smits, P.C., Annoni, A.: Updating Land-cover Maps by Using Texture Information From Very High-resolution Space-borne Imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 37 (1999) 1244–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He, D.C., Wang, L.: Texture Unit, Texture Spectrum, and Texture Analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 28 (1990) 509–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maclin, R., Opitz, D.: An Empirical Evaluation of Bagging and Boosting. In: Proc. of the 14th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 27–31 July, Providence, Rhode Island, AAAI Press (1997) 546–551

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinlan, R.J.: Bagging, Boosting, and C4.5. In: Proc. of the Thirteenth Nat. Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1996) 725–730

    Google Scholar 

  18. Breiman, L.: Arcing classifiers. Technical Report, Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. Machine Learning: Proc. of the 13th International Conference, 3–6 July, Bari (1996) 148–156

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer, E., Kohavi, R.: An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants. Machine Learning, 36 (1998) 105–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan, J.C.W., Huang, C., DeFries, R.S.: Enhanced Algorithm Performance for Land Cover Classification from Remotely Sensed Data Using Bagging and Boosting. IEEE Trans. Geosc. Remote Sensing, 39 (2001) 693–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan, J.C.W., Chan, K.P., Yeh, A.G.O.: Detecting the Nature of Change in an Urban Environment-A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms. Photo. Eng. & Remote Sensing, 67 (2001) 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, J.H.: On Bias, Variance, 0/1-loss, and the Curse-of-Dimensionality. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1 (1997) 55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quinlan, R.J.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, California (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Riou, R., Seyler, F.: Texture Analysis of Tropical Rain Forest Infrared Satellite Images. Photogramm. Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63 (1997) 515–521

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kohavi, R., Sommerfield, D., Dougherty, J.: Data mining using MLC++: a machine learning library in C++, Tools with Artificial Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chan, J.C., DeFries, R.S., Townshend, J.R.G. (2001). Improved Recognition of Spectrally Mixed Land Cover Classes Using Spatial Textures and Voting Classifications. In: Skarbek, W. (eds) Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. CAIP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44692-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44692-3_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42513-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44692-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics