Improved Recognition of Spectrally Mixed Land Cover Classes Using Spatial Textures and Voting Classifications
Regenerating forest is important to account for carbon sink. Mapping regenerating forest from satellite data is difficult because it is spectrally mixed with natural forest. This paper investigated the combined use of texture features and voting classifications to enhance recognition of these two classes. Bagging and boosting were applied on Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) and decision tree. Our results show that spatial textures improved separability. After applying voting classifications, class accuracy of decision tree increased by 5–7% and that of LVQ by approximately 3%. Substantial reduction (between 23% to 40%) of confusions between regenerating forest and natural forest were recorded. Comparatively, bagging is more consistent than boosting. An interesting observation is that even LVQ, a stable learner, was able to benefit from both voting classification algorithms.
Keywordspattern recognition spatial textures rating classifier
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar
- 4.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. A Special Report of IPCC, Summary for Policymakers (2000)Google Scholar
- 5.Houghton, R.A., Boone, R.D., Fruci, J.R., Hobbie, J.E., Melillo, J.M., Palm, C.A., Peterson, B.J., Shaver, G.R., Woodwell, G.M., Moore, B., Skole, D.L., Meyers, N.: The Flux of Carbon from Terrestrial Ecosystems to the Atmosphere in 1980 due to Changes in Land Use: Geographic Distribution of the Global Flux. Tellus, 39B (1987) 122–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bruzzone, L., Conese, C., Maselli, F., Roli, F.: Multi-Source Classification of Complex Rural Areas by Statistical and Neural-Network Approaches. Photogram. Eng. & Remote Sensing, 63 (1997) 523–533Google Scholar
- 16.Maclin, R., Opitz, D.: An Empirical Evaluation of Bagging and Boosting. In: Proc. of the 14th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 27–31 July, Providence, Rhode Island, AAAI Press (1997) 546–551Google Scholar
- 17.Quinlan, R.J.: Bagging, Boosting, and C4.5. In: Proc. of the Thirteenth Nat. Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1996) 725–730Google Scholar
- 18.Breiman, L.: Arcing classifiers. Technical Report, Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley (1996)Google Scholar
- 19.Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. Machine Learning: Proc. of the 13th International Conference, 3–6 July, Bari (1996) 148–156Google Scholar
- 22.Chan, J.C.W., Chan, K.P., Yeh, A.G.O.: Detecting the Nature of Change in an Urban Environment-A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms. Photo. Eng. & Remote Sensing, 67 (2001) 213–225Google Scholar
- 24.Quinlan, R.J.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, California (1993)Google Scholar
- 25.Riou, R., Seyler, F.: Texture Analysis of Tropical Rain Forest Infrared Satellite Images. Photogramm. Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63 (1997) 515–521Google Scholar
- 26.Kohavi, R., Sommerfield, D., Dougherty, J.: Data mining using MLC++: a machine learning library in C++, Tools with Artificial Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society Press (1996)Google Scholar