Advertisement

Technology Trends and Adaptive Computing

  • Michael J. Flynn
  • Albert A. Liddicoat
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2147)

Abstract

System and processor architectures depend on changes in technology. Looking ahead as die density and speed increase, power consumption and on chip interconnection delay become increasingly important in defining architecture tradeoffs. While technology improvements enable increasingly complex processor implementations, there are physical and program behavior limits to the usefulness of this complexity at the processor level. The architecture emphasis then shifts to the system: integrating controllers, signal processors, and other components with the processor to achieve enhanced system performance. In dealing with these elements, adaptability or reconfiguration is essential for optimizing system performance in a changing application environment. A hierarchy of adaptation is proposed based on flexible processor architectures, traditional FPL, and a new coarse grain adaptive arithmetic cell. The adaptive arithmetic cell offers high-performance arithmetic operations while providing computational flexibility. The proposed cell offers efficient and dynamic reconfiguration of the arithmetic units. Hybrid fine and coarse grain techniques may offer the best path to the continued evolution of the processor-based system.

Keywords

Arithmetic Operation Technology Trend Instruction Level Parallelism Memory Access Time Adaptive Computing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, tech report, Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose, CA, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dubey, P., and Flynn, M.: “Optimal Pipelining, Parallel and Distributed Computing,” Vol. 8, No. 1, January 1990, pp. 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hung, P., and Flynn, M.: “Optimum ILP for Superscalar and VLIW Processors,” tech report, Stanford University, EE Dept., CSL-TR-99-737, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakoglu, H.: Circuit, Interconnections, and Packaging for VLSI, Addision-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wulf W., and McKee S.: “Hitting the Memory Wall: Implications of the Obvious,” ACM Computer Architecture News, Vol. 13, No. 1, March 1995, pp. 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwarz, E.: High Radix Algorithms for Higher-Order Arithmetic Operations, PhD thesis, Stanford University, January 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stefanelli, R.: “A Suggestion for a High-Speed Parallel Binary Divider,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-21(1):42:55, January 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mandelbaum, D.: “A Method for Calculation of the Square Root Using Combinatorial Logic,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, December 1993, pp. 233–243.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mandelbaum, D.: “A Fast, Efficient, Parallel-Acting Method of Generating Functions Defined by Power Series,” IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, January 1996, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liddicoat, A., Flynn, M.: “Reciprocal Approximation Theory with Table Compensation,” In SPIE’s 45th Annual Conference, July 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Twaijry, H.: Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers, PhD thesis, Stanford University, November 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DasSarma, D., and Matula, D.: “Faithful Bipartite ROM Reciprocal Tables,” In Proc. 12th IEEE Symp. Computer Arithmetic, July 1995, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DasSarma, D., and Matula, D.: “Faithful Interpolation in Reciprocal Tables,” In Proc. 13th IEEE Symp. Computer Arithmetic, July 1997, pp. 82–91.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takagi, N.: “Generating a Power of an Operand by a Table Look-Up and a Multiplication,” In Proc. 13th IEEE Symp. Computer Arithmetic, July 1997, pp. 126–131.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takagi, N.: “Powering by a Table Look-Up and a Multiplication with Operand Modification,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-47(11):1216–1222, November 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Flynn
    • 1
  • Albert A. Liddicoat
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Systems LaboratoryDepartment of Electrical Engineering Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations