Advertisement

Combination of preparative and analytical ultracentrifugation methods for the investigation of low-density lipoprotein aliquots to prepare radioactive-labelled lipoproteins

  • Zoltán Bozóky
  • Lajos Fülöp
  • Gyõzõ Jánoki
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science book series (PROGCOLLOID, volume 119)

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) can be radiolabelled with different techniques and various tracers (99mTc, 123I, 125I, 131I, 11 1In, 67 Ga) and can be used as a tool for the noninvasive exploration of a variety of disorders of lipoprotein metabolism. Density-gradient centrifugation allows the simultaneous isolation of the major lipoprotein density classes, i.e. very low density lipoproteins, LDLs, high-density lipoproteins, forming discrete bands of lipoproteins in preparative tubes. The analysis of the principal lipid constituents was done in isolated fractions. The cholesterol and triglyceride values in the fractions were determined by enzymatic methods. The fraction limits of the bands were defined by means of prestaining the serum lipoproteins. Aliquots of the fractions were taken for Schlieren analysis after adjusting the density and underlayering with a salt solution, in a spinning ultracentrifugation capillary band-forming cell. We obtained quantitative results by measuring the Schlieren areas between the sample curves and the reference baseline curve by computerised numerical and graphical techniques. The decomposition of the integrated curve was carried out using a nonlinear regression program followed by deconvolution algorithm analysis in order to determine the parameters of the con stituent Gaussian subclasses. With the LDL particle concentration technique, we measured the concentration of LDL and analysed the polydispersity of the aliquots for the preparing of the radioactive-labelled lipoproteins. LDL is the major transport protein for endogenous cholesterol in human plasma. Radioiodination of LDL was performed using the iodogen method and LDL was radiolabelled with 99mTc using sodium dithionite as a reducing agent. The development of intracellularly trapped ligands permitted the sites of in vivo degradation of LDL to be identified. The methods described proved to be useful for a clear and immediate visual presentation of the concentration values of lipoproteins in the whole spectra and for the identification of the heterogeneity of lipoproteins subfractions. Combination of preparative and analytical ultracentrifugation methods allow lipoprotein aliquots to be investigated before and after radioactive labelling with isotopes to identify labelled materials.

Key words

Single-spin density gradient ultracentrifugation Preparative isolation of lipoproteins Investigation of lipoproteins by Schlieren curves Radioactive-labelled lipoproteins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischer WR (1983) Metabolism 32:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crouse JR, Parks JS, Schey HM (1985) J Lipid Res 26:566–574Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swinkels DW, Hak-Lemmers HLM, Demacker PNM (1987) J Lipid Res 28:1233–1239Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring ME, Willet WC, Krauss RM (1988) J Am Med Assoc 260:1917–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Witztum JL (1994) Lancet 344:793–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morel DW, DiCorleto PE, Chilson GM (1984) Arteriosclerosis 4:357–364Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Havel RJ, Eder HA, Bradgon HJ (1955) J Clin Invest 34:1345–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chung BH, Wilkinson T, Greer JC, Segrest JP (1980) J Lipid Res 21:284–291Google Scholar
  9. 9.(a)
    Fredrickson DS, Levy RI, Lees RS (1967) N Engl J Med 276:34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.(b)
    Fredrickson DS, Levy RI, Lees RS (1967) N Engl J Med 276:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.(c)
    Fredrickson DS, Levy RI, Lees RS (1967) N Engl J Med 276:48–150Google Scholar
  12. 9.(d)
    Fredrickson DS, Levy RI, Lees RS (1967) N Engl J Med 276:218–225Google Scholar
  13. 9.(e)
    Fredrickson DS, Levy RI, Lees RS (1967) N Engl J Med 276:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 10.
    Terpstra AHM, Sanchez-Muniz FJ, West CE, Woodward CJH (1982) Comp Biochem Physiol B 71:669–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 11.
    Burstein MS, Savaille S (1960) Clin Chim Acta 5:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 12.
    Bucolo G, David H (1973) Clin Chem 22:98–101Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    Dixin WJ (1981) BMDP Statistical Software. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. 14.
    Medgyessy P (1977) Decomposition of superpositions of density functions and discrete distributions. Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Science, Budapest, p 90Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    Lees RS, Garabedian HD, Lees AM (1985) J Nucl Med 26:1056–1062Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Matthews CME (1957) Phys Med Biol 2:36–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoltán Bozóky
    • 1
  • Lajos Fülöp
    • 2
  • Gyõzõ Jánoki
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Institute for Radiobiology and RadiohygieneBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Regional Blood CentreGödöllõ HungaryHungary

Personalised recommendations