Mobile Agents and Legacy Systems: How to Integrate Alternative Communication Paradigms

  • Antonio Puliafito
  • Orazio Tomarchio
  • Lorenzo Vita
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2164)


Over the last few years a large number of mobile agent systems have been developed, both in the academic field and in the industrial one. However, agent technology has hardly been adopted in developing commercial applications, notwithstanding its interesting potentialities. In our thinking, this has been mainly due to the lack of interoperability of agent technology with traditional and common techniques for developing distributed software, and to the fact that it has been often presented as the paradigm suitable for all distributed applications. Starting from this consideration, in this paper we present a model for integrating mobile agent technology into a common distributed object architecture such as CORBA. The implementation of the architecture has been carried out using our agent platform MAP, and the main strength of the adopted approach will be shown.


Distributed object-oriented technology Mobile agents CORBA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Carzaniga, G.P. Picco, and G. Vigna. Designing Distributed Applications with Mobile Code Paradigms. In Proc. of 19th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE’97), May 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.M. Chess, C.G. Harrison, and A. Kershenbaum. Mobile Agents: Are they a Good Idea? Technical Report RC19887, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, March 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    FIPA www site.
  4. 4.
    A. Fuggetta, G.P. Picco, and G. Vigna. Understanding Code Mobility. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 24(5), May 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Jain, F. Anjum, and A. Umar. A comparison of mobile agent and client-server paradigms for information retrieval tasks in virtual enterprises. In Proc. Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges (AIWORC) in Next Generation Enterprises: Virtual Organizations and Mobile/Pervasive Technologies, Buffalo, NY(USA), April 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Rothermel and R. Popescu-Zeletin Eds.,. Mobile Agents. Lecture Notes in Comp. Science, LNCS1219, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Lange and M. Oshima. Seven good reasons for mobile agents. Communications of the ACM, 3(42): 88–89, March 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    P.J. Marques, P. Simoes, L.M. Silva, F. Boavida, and J.G. Silva. Mobile agent systems: From technology to applications. In OOPSLA2000 Wokshop on Experiences with Autonomous Mobile Objects and Agent Based System, Minneapolis, USA, October 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. De Meer, A. La Corte, A. Puliafito, and O. Tomarchio. Programmable Agents for Flexible QoS Management in IP Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 18(2), February 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Milojicic, M. Breugst, S. Covaci, and al. MASIF: the OMG Mobile Agent System Interoperability Facility. In Second International Workshop on Mobile Agents, (MA’98), Stuttgart (Germany), September 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. A. Phan and A. Karmouch. Mobile Software Agents: An Overview. IEEE Communication Magazine, 31(7):26–37, July 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Di Pietro, A. La Corte, A. Puliafito, and O. Tomarchio. Extending the MASIF Location Service in the MAP Agent System. In IEEE Symposium on Computer Communications (ISCC2000), Antibes (France), July 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Puliafito, S. Riccobene, and M. Scarpa. Which paradigm should I use?: An analytical comparison of the client-server, remote evaluation and mobile agent paradigms. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 13:71–94, 2001.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Puliafito and O. Tomarchio. Security mechanisms for the MAP agent system. In 8th Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing (PDP2000), Rhodos (Greece), January 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Puliafito and O. Tomarchio. Using Mobile Agents to implement flexible Network Management strategies. Computer Communication Journal, 23(8):708–719, April 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Puliafito, O. Tomarchio, and L. Vita. MAP: Design and Implementation of a Mobile Agents Platform. Journal of System Architecture, 46(2):145–162, January 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Zahavi T.J. Mowbray. The essential CORBA: Systems Integration Using Distributed Objects. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Puliafito
    • 1
  • Orazio Tomarchio
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Vita
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di MatematicaUniversità di MessinaMessinaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica e delle TelecomunicazioniUniversità di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations