Advertisement

An Agent-based Approach to Full Interoperability and Allocation Transparency in Distributed File Systems

  • William Fornaciari
  • Vincenzo Piuri
  • Andrea Prestileo
  • Vittorio Zaccaria
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2164)

Abstract

Modern distributed file system realizations offer only partially resource location transparency, resource location independence, fault tolerance, load balancing, heterogeneity, self-configuration, and simplified user access. Traditional portability techniques developed in these systems become unsuited in highly dynamic environments.

To solve these problems within a homogeneous framework we studied and experimented the use of static and mobile agents in a portable environment. In this paper we describe the philosophy, the structure, and the prototype realization of the Agent-based Distributed File System (ADFS). The main properties of this innovative distributed file system are resource location transparency, resource location independence, self-configuration, and heterogeneity of the underlying hardware and operating system architectures.

Keywords

Mobile Agent Read Time Active Node Distribute File System Distribute Operating System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Coloris, J. Dollimore, and T. Kindberg. Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA., 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Sandberg, D. Goldberg, S. Kleiman, D. Walsh, and B. Lyon. Design and implementation of the sun network file system. In USENIX 1985 Summer Conference proceedings, pages 119–130, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun Microsystems, Inc. NFS: Network file system protocol specification. Internet Request for Comments, (1094), 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Howard, M. Kazar, S. Menees, D. Nichols, M. Satyanarayanan, R. Sidebotham, and M. West. Scale and performance in a distributed file system. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 6(4):51–81, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Satyanarayanan, J. J. Kistler, P. Kumar, M. E. Okasaki, E. H. Siegel, and D. C. Steere. Coda: A highly available file system for a distributed workstation environment. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 39(4): 447–459, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruce Walker, Gerald Popek, Robert English, Charles Kline, and Greg Thiel. The LOCUS distributed operating systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), volume 17, pages 49–70, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Popek and B. Walker. The locus distributed system, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. K. Ousterhout, A. R. Cherenson, F. Douglis, M. N. Nelson, and B. B. Welch. The sprite network operating system. Computer Magazine of the Computer Group News of the IEEE Computer Group Society, 21(2), 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Welch and J. Ousterhout. Prefix tables: A simple mechanism for locating files in a distributed system. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 184–189, Washington, DC, 1986. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Levy and A. Silberschatz. Distributed file systems: Concepts and examples. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(4):321–374, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Anderson, M. Dahlin, J. Neefe, D. Patterson, and R. Wang. Serverless network file systems performance. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 14(1):41–79, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Microsoft. Distributed file system: A logical view of physical storage, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Rothermel and F. Hohl. Mobile Agents (MA’ 98). Number 1477. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Springer, Berlin; Heidelberg, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Harrison, D. Chess, and A. Kershenbaum. Mobile agents: Are they a good idea? Technical report, IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, http://www.research.ibm.com/massdist/mobag.ps, 1995.
  15. 15.
    Davis Chess, Benjamin Grosof, Colin Harrison, David Levine, Colin Parris, and Gene Tsudik. Itinerant Agents for Mobile Computing. IEEE Personal Communications, 2(5):34–49, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ken Arnold and James Gosling. The Java Programming Language. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Fornaciari
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Piuri
    • 2
    • 1
  • Andrea Prestileo
    • 3
  • Vittorio Zaccaria
    • 1
  1. 1.Dip. di Elettronica e InformazionePolitecnico di MilanoMilanoITALY
  2. 2.Department of Information TechnologiesUniversity of MilanCremaITALY
  3. 3.Cluster Reply MilanoMilanoITALY

Personalised recommendations