Skip to main content

Cognitive Technology: Tool or Instrument?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind (CT 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2117))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses the tool aspect of the cognitive artifacts often referred to as ‘instruments of mind’. Having established the basic distinction between tool and instrument, the authors then go on to review the notion of artifact itself, and discuss the potential for mind change that is inherent in the use of ‘mental’ instruments such as the computer. It is pointed out that the relationship between the mind and its instruments is a dialectic one, and that the ‘reflexivity’ inherent in this relationship constitutes the very nature of our interaction with cognitive instruments, such as it is studied in Cognitive Technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ehn, Pelle. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, William. 1984. Neuromancer. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, Barbara. 1994. ‘How not to lose the soul of language’. Journal of Pragmatics 22(5): 536–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, Barbara and Jonathon P. Marsh, 1996. Epistemic Technology and Relevance Analysis: Rethinking Cognitive Technology. In Gorayska and Mey, eds. Cognitive Technology: In search of a humane interface. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, Barbara & Jonathon P. Marsh. 1999. ‘Investigations in Cognitive Technology: Questioning perspective’. In: Marsh, Gorayska & Mey, eds. Humane Interfaces: Questions of method and practice in Cognitive Technology, 17–43. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, Stefan. 1998. ‘Replicating reproduction in Artificial Life: Or, the essence of life in the age of virtual electronic reproduction’. In: Sarah Franklin & Heléna Ragoné, eds., Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power and technological innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 207–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, Ivan. 1973. Tools for conviviality. London: Calders & Boyar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Christopher (ed.) 1989. Artificial Life. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Christopher, Charles Taylor, J. Doyne Farmer & Steen Rasmussen (eds.) 1992. Artificial Life II. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Christopher (ed.) 1994. Artificial Life III. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, Roger O. 1999. “Can we change our minds?” In: Marsh, Gorayska & Mey, eds. 1999:45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Jonathon P., Barbara Gorayska & Jacob L. Mey, eds. 1999. Humane interfaces: Questions of method and practice in Cognitive Technology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1971. Wage labour and capital. In: T.B. Bottomore, Karl Marx, Selected writings in sociology and social philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [1848]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, Jacob L. 1982. ‘And ye shall be as machines’. Journal of Pragmatics 8(5/6):757–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, Jacob L. 1996. ‘Cognitive Technology — Technological Cognition’. AI & Society 10:226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mey, Jacob L. 1998. ‘Adaptability’. In: J.L. Mey, ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: ElsevierScience. pp. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An introduction. Malden, Mass. & Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers. (Second, greatly enlarged and entirely revised edition). [1993]

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Marvin. 1986. The society of mind. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Donald A. 1986. ‘Cognitive engineering’. In: D.A. Norman & S.W. Draper (eds.), User-centered system design. Hillsdale, N.J. & London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Donald A. 1993. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, Mass, etc.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, Andrew. 1993. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Second edition) [1979]

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C. 2001. Scrooge meets Dick and Jane. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gorayska, B., Marsh, J.P., Mey, J.L. (2001). Cognitive Technology: Tool or Instrument?. In: Beynon, M., Nehaniv, C.L., Dautenhahn, K. (eds) Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind. CT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44617-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44617-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42406-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44617-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics