Abstract
This paper addresses two proposed properties of the kind of linguistic focus connected to alternatives in discourse: contrast and exhaustiveness. Using data occurring in spontaneous spoken English, it argues that neither contrast nor exhaustiveness is inherent to a particular category of focus. These characteristics can be derived from the contexts in which focus occurs, and thus do not need to be considered an inherent part of the meaning of focus. Contrast and exhaustiveness thus result from pragmatic aspects rather than from linguistic features of focus. They can be understood to arise from the interaction of the meaning of focus with the pragmatics of the context in which it occurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Krifka, M. Focus in Grammar and Discourse. (to appear).
Pierrehumbert, J. The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. Dissertation, MIT (1980).
Beckman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3 (1986): 255–309.
Halliday, M.A.K. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3 (1967): 37–81.
Sgall, P.H., Hajicova, E., Panevova, J.. The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Reidel, Dordrecht. (1986)
Rochemont, M. Focus in generative grammar.: John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1986.)
Lambrecht, K. Information structure and sentence focus. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)
Rooth, M. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1 (1992): 75–116.
Stechow, A. von. Focusing and backgrounding operators. In W. Abraham, ed., Discourse Particles. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1990)
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam (1984)
Krifka, M. For a structured account of questions and answers. Proceedings to Workshop on Spoken and Written Text, ed. C. Smith, University of Texas at Austin (1999)
Zubizaretta, M-L. Prosody, focus and word order. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (1998)
É.Kiss, K. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74 (1998): 245–273.
Ladd, D.R.. The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1980)
Ladd, D.R. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
van Deemter, K. Contrastive Stress, contrariety and focus. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt, eds. Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/ New York (1999)
Umbach, C. Non-given definites. Paper at Sinn und Bedeutung V, Amsterdam, December 2000 (2000)
Bush, R. & M. Tevdoradze. Identificational foci in Georgian. Proceedings of NELS 30 (1999).
Cohan, J.B.. The realization and function of focus in spoken English. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin (2000)
Grice, H.P. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan, eds., Speech Acts, p. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Hirschberg, J. & Ward, G. The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics (1995): 407–412.
Prince, E. A comparison of it-clefts and wh-clefts in discourse. Language 45 (1978): 883–906.
Jackendoff, R. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1972)
Sczabolsci, A. The semantics of topic-focus articuation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, M. Stokhof, eds., Formal Methods in the Study of Language. pp. 513–541 Matematisch Centrum, Amsterdam (1981)
Beaver, David. Presupposition. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen, eds., Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)
Horn, Laurence.. Presupposition and implicature. In S. Lappin, ed., The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. pp. 299–319. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cohan, J. (2001). Consider the Alternatives: Focus in Contrast and Context. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42379-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44607-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive