Skip to main content

Autonomous Cooperative Factory Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1881))

Abstract

In a highly flexible manufacturing line, the ability of the control system to react to and predict changes will ultimately determine the productivity of that line. This paper describes an Autonomous Cooperative System (ACS) for flexibly control a manufacturing line. The system allows each section of the line to have autonomy for controlling the operations of the underlying physical equipment. Autonomous decisions are carried out while the overall operations are optimized through cooperation among the controlled sections. ACS provides the ability to compensate for product changes, equipment wear and equipment failure. ACS was applied to a steel-rod production line. The operation of the line was observed during conditions of process and product changes. The results show how ACS reduced the impact of change and increased the productivity and flexibility of the line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, F.: Mythical Man Month, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agile Precision Sheet Metal Stamping Proposal, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standard and Technology, April llth, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Proceedings of the 4th Technical Advisory Committee Meeting, NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machine Systems, May 6–7th, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Proceedings of Auto Body Consortium, Inc.: Near Zero Stamping, Inc. Kickoff Meeting, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Microprocessor Report, http://www.chipanalyst.eom/q/@2271248bqwrrv/report/mpr.html

  6. Gigabit Ethernet, http://www.gigabit-ethernet.org/

  7. Steels, L.: “Toward a Theory of Emergent Functionality” From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the lst International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W.: Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bond, A. and Gasser, L.: Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Hare, G. and Jennings, N.: Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley/Sons, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clearwater, S.: Market-based control: A paradigm for distributed resource allocation, World Scientific, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenschein, J. and Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter: Designing for Automated Negotiation among Computers, The MIT Press, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N.: Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152, (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, R. and Smith, R.G.: Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20:63–109, (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park, K.H. and Cutkosky, M.: A.B., Conru, and S.H., Lee, An agent based approach to concurrent cable harness design, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Journal, 8(1), 45–61, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tenenbaum, J.M., Gruber, T.R., and Weber, J.C.: Lessons from SHADE and PACT. In Petrie, C. (Eds), Enterprise Modeling and Integration. McGraw-Hill, New York, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen, J.H.: iHolonic Manufacturing Systems: Initial architecture and standards direction, First European Conference on Holonic Manufacturing Systems, Hanover, Germany, 20pp, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parunak, H.V.D., Baker, A.D., and Clark, S.J.: The AARIA Agent Architecture: An Example of Requirements-Driven Agent-Based System Design. IN Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Marina del Rey, CA., (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weiming S., Maturana, F., and Norrie, D.: MetaMorph II: An Agent-Based Architecture for Distributed Intelligent Design and Manufacturing, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(3), 237–251, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vasko, D., Maturana, F., Bowles, A., Vandenberg, S. (2000). Autonomous Cooperative Factory Control. In: Zhang, C., Soo, VW. (eds) Design and Applications of Intelligent Agents. PRIMA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1881. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44594-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44594-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67911-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44594-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics