Skip to main content

When Two Case Bases Are Better than One: Exploiting Multiple Case Bases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2080))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Much current CBR research focuses on how to compact, refine, and augment the contents of individual case bases, in order to distill needed information into a single concise and authoritative source. However, as deployed case-based reasoning systems become increasingly prevalent, opportunities will arise for supplementing local case bases on demand, by drawing on the case bases of other CBR systems addressing related tasks. Taking full advantage of these case bases will require multi-case-base reasoning: Reasoning not only about how to apply cases, but also about when and how to draw on particular case bases. This paper begins by considering tradeoffs of attempting to merge individual case bases into a single source, versus retaining them individually, and argues that retaining multiple case bases can benefit both performance and maintenance. However, achieving the benefits requires methods for case dispatching—deciding when to retrieve from external case bases, and which case bases to select—and for cross-case-base adaptation to revise suggested solutions from one context to apply in another. The paper presents initial experiments illustrating how these procedures may a ect the benefits of using multiple case bases, and closes by delineating key research issues for multi-case-base reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. Ashish and C. Knoblock. Wrapper generation for semi-structured internet sources. In SIGMOD Record, volume 26, pages 8–15, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Auriol, P. Avesani, B. Bartsch-Spoerl, M. Goeker, M. Manago, K. Pulaski, and W. Wilke, editors. Workshop Notes, Workshop on Innovative Customer Centered Applications (ICCA), Trento, Italy, 2000. EWCBR-2K.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Burke, K. Hammond, V. Kulyukin, S. Lytinen, N. Tomuro, and S. Schoenberg. Question answering from frequently asked question les: Experiences with the FAQFinder system. AI Magazine, 18(2):57–66, Summer 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Cunningham and G. Zenobi. Case representation issues for case-based reasoning from ensemble research. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Berlin, 2001. Springer Verlag. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Dietterich. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, pages 1–15, Berlin, 2000. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conor Hayes, Páadraig Cunningham, and Michelle Doyle. Distributed CBR using XML. In Proceedings of the KI-98 Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Electronic Commerce, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Leake and R. Scherle. Towards context-based search engine selection. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 109–112, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Leake and D. Wilson. Remembering why to remember: Performance-guided case-base maintenance. In E. Blanzieri and L. Portinale, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 161–172, Berlin, 2000. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Leake, B. Smyth, Q. Yang, and D. Wilson, editors. Maintaining Case-Based Reasoning Systems. Blackwell, 2001. Special issue of Computational Intelligence. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Martin, E. Plaza, and J.-L. Arcos. Knowledge and experience reuse through communications among competent (peer) agents. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 9(3):319–341, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. McGinty and B. Smyth. Collaborative case-based reasoning: Applications in personalised route planning. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Berlin, 2001. Springer Verlag. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Portinale, P. Torasso, and P. Tavano. Speed-up, quality, and competence in multi-modal reasoning. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 303–317, Berlin, 1999. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. V. Nagendra Prasad, V. Lesser, and S. Lander. Reasoning and retrieval in distributed case bases. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 7(1):74–87, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Riesbeck. What next? The future of CBR in postmodern AI. In D. Leake, editor, Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions, pages 371–388. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.C. Schank. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Shimazu and Y. Takashima. Detecting discontinuities in case-bases. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artifical Intelligence, volume 1, pages 690–695, Menlo Park, CA, 1996. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Smyth and E. McKenna. Building compact competent case-bases. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on CaseBased Reasoning, pages 329–342, Berlin, 1999. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Smyth and E. McKenna. Footprint-based retrieval. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 343–357, Berlin, 1999. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Sugiura and O. Etzioni. Query routing for web search engines: Architechture and experiments. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the Ninth World Wide Web Conference (WWW9), pages 417–429, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Watson and R. Perera. The evaluation of a hierarchical case representation using context guided retrieval. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 255–266, Berlin, 1997. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jun Zhu and Qiang Yang. Remembering to add: Competence-preserving case-addition policies for case base maintenance. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 234–241. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leake, D.B., Sooriamurthi, R. (2001). When Two Case Bases Are Better than One: Exploiting Multiple Case Bases. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics