Improving Student Models by Reasoning about Cognitive Ability, Emotions and Gender
- 688 Downloads
We explore how cognitive, socio-biological and emotional conditions of the student help predict behavior within an ITS, and how instruction should be adapted depending on these variables to improve educational outcomes. Cognitive, social and emotional factors tend to be more permanent in nature than student’s knowledge. Our approach is to diagnose them with pre-tests before the user starts using the system.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Arroyo, I.; Beck, J.; Beal, C.; Woolf, B.; Schultz, K.: Macroadapting Animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2000)Google Scholar
- 2.Arroyo, I.; Conejo, R.; Guzman, E.; Woolf, B.P.: An Adaptive Web-based Component for Cognitive Ability Estimation. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2001)Google Scholar
- 3.Beal, C.R, Woolf, B.P., Beck, J.E., Arroyo, I., Schultz, K., Hart, D.M.: Gaining Confidence in Mathematics: Instructional Technology for Girls. Proceedings of Mathematics/Science Education and Technology (2000) pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
- 5.Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Jacobs, V.R., Franke, M.L., Levi, L.W. (1998, June-July). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27, 6–11.Google Scholar
- 6.Piaget, J. How Children Form Mathematical Concepts. 1953. In Scientific American.Google Scholar
- 8.Voyat, G.E.: Piaget Systematized (1982). Lawrence Erlbawm.Google Scholar