Advertisement

Applying Interactive Open Learner Models to Learning Technical Terminology

  • Vania Dimitrova
  • John Self
  • Paul Brna
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2109)

Abstract

Our work explores an interactive open learner modelling (IOLM) approach where learner diagnosis is considered as an interactive process involving both a computer system and a learner that play symmetrical (to a certain extent) roles and construct together the learner model. The paper presents an application of IOLM for diagnosing and fostering a learner’s conceptual understanding in a terminological domain. Based on an experimental study, we discuss computational and educational benefits of IOLM in terms of improving the quality of the obtained learner model and fostering reflective thinking.

Keywords

Intelligent tutoring systems student modelling meta-cognitive skills 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelova, G., Nenkova, A., Boycheva, Sv., & Nikolov T. (2000). CGs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment. In B. Ganter & G.W. Mineau (eds.), Proc. of int. conference on conceptual structures. Shaker Verlag, 45–58.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1996). What is reflection in learning. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (eds.), Reflection: turning experience into learning. Kogan Page,7–17.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boytcheva, S. Kalaydgjiev, O. Nenkova, A. & Angelova G. (2000). Integration of resources and components in a knowledge-based web environment for terminology learning. In S. Cerri & D. Dochev (eds.), AI: methodology, systems and applications. Springer, 210–220.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bull, S. (1997). Collaborative student modelling in foreign language learning. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chanier, T. (1996). Learning a second language for specific purposes within a hypermedia framework. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9(1), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dewey, J. (1960). How we think-a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimitrova, V. (in preparation). Interactive open learner modeling. PhD Thesis. Computer Based Learning Unit, Leeds University, expected submission in April 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dimitrova, V., Self, J.A. & Brna, P. (1999). The interactive maintenance of open learner models.In S Lajoie & M. Vivet (eds.),Artificial intelligence in education. IOS Press, 405–412.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dimitrova, V., Self, J.A. & Brna, P. (2000). Maintaining a jointly constructed student model. In S. Cerri & D. Dochev (eds.), AI: Methodology, Systems and Applications, Springer, 221–231.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kay J. (1999). A scrutable user modelling shell for user-adapted interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morales, R., Pain, H., & Conlon, T. (2000). Understandable learner models for a sensorimotor control task. In G. Gauthier & C. Frasson, ITS’2000, Berlin: Springer, 222–231.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morales, R., Pain, H., Bull, S., & Kay, J. (1999). Workshop on open, interactive, and other overt approaches to learner modeling. AIED’99, Le Mans, France.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paiva, A. & Self, J.A. (1995). TAGUS-a user and learner modelling workbench, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Self, J.A. (1990). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modeling. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (eds.),ITS: At the crossroad of artificial intelligence and education, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singer, M. (1990). Psychology of language: An introduction of sentence and discourse processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, J. (1998). Everyone’s ABC of accounting language http://www.//soc.staffs.ac.uk/~cmrjs/agloss.htm.
  17. 17.
    Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vania Dimitrova
    • 1
  • John Self
    • 1
  • Paul Brna
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Based Learning UnitLeeds UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations