Advertisement

Agent-Based Software Engineering

  • Charles Petrie
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1957)

Abstract

It has previously been claimed that agent technologies facilitate software development by virtue of their high-level abstractions for interactions. We address a more specific characterization and utility.We believe that it is important to distinguish agent technologies from other software technologies by virtue of a set of unique software characteristics. This is in contrast to much in the literature that concentrates on high-level characteristics that could be implemented with a variety of software techniques.

Agent-based software engineering (ABSE), for at least an important class of agents and applications, can be characterized by both model and inner/outer language components. Our experience in developing applications based on longterm asynchronous exchange of agent messages, similar to typical email usage, leads us to believe these unique characteristics facilitate useful software development practices. The utility derives from a stratification of change among the components, ease of collaborative change and debugging even during runtime due to asynchronous text parsing-based message exchange, and reuse of the outer language as well as generic agents as a programming environment.1

Keywords

Agent System Agent Theory Model Translation Legacy Code Remote Procedure Call 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Decker, K., Sycara, K., Pannu, A., and Williamson, M., “Designing Behaviors for Information Agents,” Proc. First Internat. Conf. on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS-97), February, 1997. See also http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ftagents/papers/autoag96.ps.gz.
  2. 2.
    R. Elio and A. Haddadi, “Abstract Models and Conversation Policies”, Proc. Workshop on Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Autonomous Agents’99 Conference, Seattle, May, 1999. See also http://www.boeing.com/special/agents99/elioa.pdf.
  3. 3.
    B. Faltings, O. Belakdar, S. Willmott,“Intelligent Agents”, CS course at EPFL, Lausanne, 2000. See also http://nrc.stanford.edu/~etrie/agents/falt.html.
  4. 4.
    M. Genesereth and S. Ketchpel, “Software Agents”qq, Communications of the ACM, 37 (7), July 1994. See also http://logic.stanford.edu/papers/agents.ps.
  5. 5.
    M. Huhns, “Interaction-Oriented Programming”, in this volume.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. R. Jennings, “On Agent-Based Software Engineering”, Artificial Intelligence 117(2000), pp. 277–296, Elsevier Press, April, 2000.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge “Agent-Oriented Software Engineering” in Handbook of Agent Technology, (ed. J. Bradshaw) AAAI/MIT Press, 2000. See also ftp://ftp.elec.qmw.ac.uk/pub/isag/distributed-ai/publications/agt-handbook.pdf.
  8. 8.
    H. Jeon, C. Petrie, and M/ R. Cutkosky, “JATLite: A Java Agent Infrastructure with Message Routing,” IEEE Internet Computing, Mar/Apr 2000. See also http://wwwcdr.stanford.edu/ProcessLink/papers/jat/jat.html.
  9. 9.
    K. L. Myers and D. E. Wilkins, “The Act Formalism”, Version 2.2, SRI International Artificial Intelligence Center, Menlo Park, CA, September 1997. See also http://www.ai.sri.com/~act/act-spec.ps.
  10. 10.
    D. Parks, “Agent-Oriented Programming: A Practical Evaluation”, http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~davidp/cs263/, 1997.
  11. 11.
    C. Petrie, “Agent-Based Engineering, the Web, and Intelligence”, IEEE Expert, December, 1996. See also http://cdr.stanford.edu/NextLink/Expert.html.
  12. 12.
    C. Petrie, S. Goldmann, and A. Raquet, “Agent-Based Project Management”, Lecture Notes in AI 1600 pp. 339–362, Springer-Verlag, 1999. See also http://cdr.stanford.edu/ProcessLink/papers/DPM/dpm.html.
  13. 13.
    A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff, “BDI agents: From theory to practice,” Tech. Rep. 56, Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Melbourne, Australia, April 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Shoham, Y., “Agent-Oriented Programming” Artificial Intelligence, 60 (1), pp. 51–92, 1993.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    A. Tate, B. Drabble, and J. Dalton, “The Open Planning Architecture and its Application to Logistics”, in Advanced Planning Technology (ed. A. Tate), pp. 257–264, AAAI Press, 1996. See also ftp://ftp.aiai.ed.ac.uk/pub/documents/1996/96-arpi-oplan-and-logistics.ps.
  16. 17.
    G. Wagner, “Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design of Organizational Information Systems”, in Proc. of Fourth IEEE International BalticWorkshop on Databases and Information Systems, Vilnius (Lithuania), May 2000. See also http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/_wagnerg/BalticDB2000.ps.
  17. 19.
    M. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings “Software Engineering with Agents: Pitfalls and Pratfalls” in IEEE Internet Computing, 3 (3), May/June 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    M. Wooldridge, “Verifiable Semantics for Agent Communication Languages”, in Proc. of ICMAS98, pp. 349–356, IEEE Computer Society Press, May, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Petrie
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford Networking Research CenterStanford

Personalised recommendations