Advertisement

About Direct Methods

  • M. Irani
  • P. Anandan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1883)

Abstract

This report provides a brief summary of the review of “Direct Methods”, which was presented by Michal Irani and P. Anandan.

Keywords

Motion Model Global Motion Local Shape Laplacian Pyramid Multiple Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.R. Bergen, P. Anandan, K.J. Hanna, and R. Hingorani. Hierarchical model-based motion estimation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 237–252, Santa Margarita Ligure, May 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.J. Black and P. Anandan. The robust estimation of multiple motions: Parametric and piecewise-smooth flow fields. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 63:75–104, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.J. Burt, R. Hingorani, and R.J. Kolczynski. Mechanisms for isolating component patterns in the sequential analysis of multiple motion. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion, pages 187–193, Princeton, New Jersey, October 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Hanna. Direct multi-resolution estimation of ego-motion and structure from motion. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion, pages 156–162, Princeton, NJ, October 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. J. Hanna and N. E. Okamoto. Combining stereo and motion for direct estimation of scene structure. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 357–365, Berlin, May 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Hansen, P. Anandan, K. Dana, G. van der Wal, and P. Burt. Real-time scene stabilization and mosaic construction. In Proc. of the Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision II, Sarasota, Fl., 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.K.P. Horn and B.G. Schunck. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence, 17:185–203, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Irani and P. Anandan. Robust multi-sensor image alignment. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, January 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Irani, P. Anandan, J. Bergen, R. Kumar, and S. Hsu. Efficient representations of video sequences and their application. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 8(4), 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Irani, P. Anandan, and M. Cohen. Direct recovery of planar-parallax from multiple frames. In Vision Algorithms 99, Corfu, September 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Irani, P. Anandan, and S. Hsu. Mosaic based representations of video sequences and their applications. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 605–611, Cambridge, MA, November 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Irani and S. Peleg. Improving resolution by image registration. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 53:231–239, May 1991.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Irani and S. Peleg. Using motion analysis for image enhancement. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 4(4):324–335, December 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Irani, B. Rousso, and S. Peleg. Computing occluding and transparent motions. International Journal of Computer Vision, 12:5–16, February 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Kumar, P. Anandan, and K. Hanna. Direct recovery of shape from multiple views: a parallax based approach. In Proc 12th ICPR, pages 685–688, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Mandelbaum, G. Salgian, and H. Sawhney. Correlation-based estimation of egomotion and structure from motion and stereo. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 544–550, Corfu, September 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.S. Sawhney and S. Ayer. Compact representations of videos through dominant and multiple motion estimation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18:814–830, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Szeliski. Image mosaicing for tele-reality applications. Technical Report CRL 94/2, DEC Cambridge Research Lab, May 1994.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Szeliski and J. Coughlan. Hierarchical spline-based image registration. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 194–201, June 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Szeliski and S.B. Kang. Direct methods for visual scene reconstruction. In Workshop on Representations of Visual Scenes, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Irani
    • 1
  • P. Anandan
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer Science and Applied MathematicsThe Weizmann Inst. of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Microsoft ResearchRedmondUSA

Personalised recommendations