Skip to main content

Reducing False Causality in Causal Message Ordering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
High Performance Computing — HiPC 2000 (HiPC 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1970))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A significant shortcoming of causal message ordering systems is their inefficiency because of false causality. False causality is the result of the inability of the “happens before” relation to model true causal relationships among events. The ineficiency of causal message ordering algorithms takes the form of additional delays in message delivery and requirements for large message buffers. This paper gives a lightweight causal message ordering algorithm based on a modified “happens before” relation. This lightweight algorithm greatly reduces the inefficiencies that traditional causal message ordering algorithms suffer from, by reducing the problem of false causality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y. Amir, D. Dolev, S. Kramer and D. Malki, Transis: A communication sub-system for high-availability, Proc. 22nd International Symposium on Fault-tolerant Computing, IEEE Computer Society Press, 337–346, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Birman, A response to Cheriton and Skeen’s criticism of causal and totally ordered communication, Operating Systems Review, 28(1): 11–21, Jan. 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Birman, T. Joseph, Reliable communication in the presence of failures, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 5(1): 47–76, Feb. 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Birman, A. Schiper and P. Stephenson, Lightweight causal and atomic group multicast, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 9(3): 272–314, Aug. 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Caroll, A. Borshchev, A deterministic model of time for distributed systems, Proc. Eighth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 593–598, Oct. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.R. Cheriton, D. Skeen, Understanding the limitations of causally and totally ordered communication, Proc. 11th ACM Symposium on the Operating Systems Principles, 44–57, Dec. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Fidge, Logical time in distributed computing systems, IEEE Computer, 24(8): 28–33, Aug. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Gambhire, Efficient Causal Message Ordering, M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Kaashoek, A. Tanenbaum, Group communication in the Ameoba distributed operating system, Proc. Fifth ACM Annual Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 125–136, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Kshemkalyani, M. Singhal, Necessary and sufficient conditions on information for causal message ordering and their optimal implementation, Distributed Computing, 11(2), 91–111, April 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Lamport, Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system, Communications of the ACM, 21(7): 558–565, July 1978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L.L. Peterson, N.C. Bucholz and R.D. Schlichting, Preserving and using context information in interprocess communication, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 7(3), 217–246, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Raynal, A. Schiper, S. Toueg, The causal ordering abstraction and a simple way to implement it, Information Processing Letters 39:343–350, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Rodrigues, P. Verissimo, Causal separators and topological timestamping: an approach to support causal multicast in large-scale systems, Proc. 15th IEEE International Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. van Renesse, Causal controversy at Le Mont St. Michel, Operating Systems Review, 27(2):44–53, April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Schiper, A. Eggli, A. Sandoz, A new algorithm to implement causal ordering, Proc. Third International Workshop on Distributed Systems, Nice, France, LNCS 392, Springer-Verlag, 219–232, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Tarafdar, V. Garg, Addressing false causality while detecting predicates in distributed programs, Proc. 18th IEEE International Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, 94–101, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gambhire, P., Kshemkalyani, A.D. (2000). Reducing False Causality in Causal Message Ordering. In: Valero, M., Prasanna, V.K., Vajapeyam, S. (eds) High Performance Computing — HiPC 2000. HiPC 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1970. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44467-X_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44467-X_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41429-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44467-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics