Advertisement

A Business Model for Charging and Accounting of Internet Services

  • Helmut Kneer
  • Urs Zurfluh
  • Gabriel Dermler
  • Burkhard Stiller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1875)

Abstract

The fast growing development of electronic commerce within the past few years and the increasing number of multimedia applications for the Internet contribute to traffic congestion and bottlenecks on the Internet. Since bandwidth is and will remain a scarce network resource in the future, the demand for charging and accounting mechanisms for the Internet arose.

Besides from the implementation of charging and accounting mechanisms for Internet services, it is essential to define a business model for electronic business applications. This paper introduces a business model that defines and characterizes the business entities and describes their roles and functions within an e-commerce scenario. Based on these definitions, a technology model applies the different Internet technologies available today.

Keywords

Business Model Internet Protocol Service Level Agreement Internet Service Internet Service Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. P. Bailey: The Economics of Internet Interconnection Agreements, Internet Economics, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss: An Architecture for Differentiated Services; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 2475, December 1998.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Braden, S. Berson, S. Herzog, S. Jamin: Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)-Version 1 Functional Specification; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 2205, September 1997.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Braden, D. Clark, S. Shenker: Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 1633, June 1994.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Deering, R. Hinden: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)-Specification; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 2460, December 1998Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Dermler, G. Fankhauser, B. Stiller, T. Braun, M. Günter, H. Kneer: Integration of Charging and Accounting into Internet Models and VPN; Public CATI Deliverable CATI-IBM-DN-P-004-1.5, June 30, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Fankhauser, B. Stiller, C. Vögtli, B. Plattner: Reservation-based Charging in an Integrated Services Network; 4th INFORMS Telecommunications Conference, Bocca Raton, Florida, U.S.A., March 1998, Session MC-2.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Gupta, D. Stahl, A. Whinston. The economics of network management, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No. 9, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    U. Kaiser: Sicherheits-und Kostenaspekte in elektronischen Zahlungssystemen für RSVP; Institut für Technische Informatik und Kommunikationsnetze, TIK, ETH Zürich, Student’ s Thesis, August 1998.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Kneer, U. Zurfluh, C. Matt: Business Model (RSVP); Public CATI Deliverable CATI-UZH-DN-P-001-2.0, March 12, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Kneer, U. Zurfluh, C. Matt: Business Roles and Relationships; Public CATI Deliverable CATI-UZH-DN-P-003-2.0, June 30, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Kneer, U. Zurfluh, C. Matt: Security Architecture; Public CATI Deliverable CATI-UZH-DN-P-002-3.0, June 30, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black: Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 2474, December 1998Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    C. Partridge: A Proposed Flow Specification; BBN, Request for Comments RFC 1363.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. Partridge: Using the Flow Label Field in IPv6; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 1809, June 1995.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Postel (Edt.): Internet Protocol; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 791, September 1981.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. Reichl, S. Leinen, B. Stiller: A Practical Review of Pricing and Cost Recovery for Internet Services; 2nd Berlin Internet Economics Workshop (IEW’99), Berlin, Germany, May 28–29, 1999. Session “Survey I”.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Shenker, C. Partridge, R. Guerin: Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 2212, September 1997.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    B. Stiller, T. Braun, M. Günter, B. Plattner: The CATI Project-Charging and Accounting Technology for the Internet; Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1629, 5th European Conference on Multimedia Applications, Services, and Techniques (ECMAST’99), Madrid, Spain, May 26–28, 1999, pp 281–296.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. Stiller, G. Fankhauser, G. Joller, P. Reichl, N. Weiler: Open Charging and QoS Interfaces for IP Telephony; The Internet Summit (INET’ 99), San Jose, California, U.S.A., June 22–25, 1999, Track 4 “Technology”, Session “IP Audio”.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    C. Topolcic: Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II); CIP Working Group, Request for Comments RFC 1190.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    UUNET Service Level Agreements; available at URL: http://www.uunet.com/customer/sla
  23. [23]
    N. Weiler, G, Joller, B. Stiller, G. Fankhauser: Trust Model; Public CATI Deliverable CATI-TIK-DN-P-010-2.0, May 28, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. Wroclawski: Specification of the Controlled-Load Network Element Service; IETF, Request for Comments RFC 2211, September 1997.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    L. Zhang, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker, D. Zappala, RSVP: A New Resource Reservation Protocol, IEEE Networks Magazine, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp 8–18, September 1993.tCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Kneer
    • 1
  • Urs Zurfluh
    • 1
  • Gabriel Dermler
    • 2
  • Burkhard Stiller
    • 3
  1. 1.IBM Research LaboratoryZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory TIKSwiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH ZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Institut für Informatik IFIUniversity of ZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations