Abstract
Favored by the Security Exchange Commission, Electronics Communication Networks (ECNs) have grown as alternative trading systems that enable to bypass the markets makers on the stock markets and allow investors to directly compensate and execute their orders with more discretion and at a lower cost.
In this paper we underline the fragile character of the current ECNs and question their competitive advantages through empirical evidences. We find a rationale for market makers and ECNs’ excessive spreads and overreactions. The use of network theory highlights notions of critical mass, open interface and alliances. Moreover, since competition between market makers and ECNs is based on volume, the emergence of ECNs has been mainly possible because of the growth of the American stock market. Furthermore, strategies of new ECNs are built on anticipated future growth. Should the market shrink, ECNs would rapidly be forced to merge and most of them would disappear.
We would like to thank Grigorios Mamalis for careful reading, Robert Dornau for interesting comments. All our errors are indeed ours. A longer electronic version of this article is available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/fmg/people/ben-hamou/publication.html
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Biais, B. T. Foucault, F. Salanie ”Floors, dealer market and limit order markets”, Journal of Financial Markets, No. 1. (1998), pp. 253–284.
Barclay, M. J., Christie W.G., Harris J. H., Kandel E, Schultz P. ”The Effects of Market Reform on the Trading Costs and Depths on Nasdaq Stocks”, Journal of Finance. Vol LIV, No 1 (February 1999) pp 1–35.
Christie, W. G. and P.H. Schultz, ”Why do Nasdaq market makers avoid odd eighth Quotes?” Journal of Finance (December 1994), 1813–1840.
Chung, K.H.; Van Ness, B.F.; Van Ness, R.A. ”Limit Orders And The Bid-ask Spread-A Paired Comparison Of Execution Costs On Nasdaq And The Nyse” Journal of Financial Economics 53 (1999), pp 255–287.
Demsetz, Harold, ”Limit orders and the alleged Nasdaq collusion”, Journal of Financial Economics 45 (1997), pp 91–96
Dutta, Prajit, and Ananth Madhavan, ”Competition and collusion in dealer markets”, Journal of Finance 52 (1997), pp 245–276
Economides, N., Liquidity and Markets, in: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Finance (1992)
Economides, N., Network Economics with Application to Finance, Financial Markets, Institutions. (1993)
Economides, N. and R.A. Schwartz, Equity Trading Practices and Market Structure: Assessing Asset Managers? Demand for Immediacy, Financial Markets, Institutions (1995).
Economides, Nicholas and Charles Himmelberg, (1995), ”Critical Mass and Network Size with Application to the US Fax Market,” Discussion Paper no.EC-95-11, Stern School of Business, N.Y.U.
Glosten Lawrence R. ”Isthe Electronic Open Limit Order Book Inevitable?” Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, No. 4. (Sep., 1994), pp. 1127–1161.
Godek, P.E. ”Why Nasdaq market makers avoid odd-eighth quotes”, Journal of Financial Economics, 41 (1996), pp. 465–474.
Grossman, Sanford J., ”The Informational Role of Upstairs and Downstairs Trading”, Journal of Business, Vol. 65, No. 4. (Oct., 1992), pp. 509–528.
Hendershott Terrence and Haim Mendelson ”Crossing Networks and Dealer Markets: Competition and Performance” forthcoming in the Journal of Finance (1999)
Huang, R.D.; Stoll, H.R..”Dealer Versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison Of Execution Costs On Nasdaq And The Nyse” Journal of Financial Economics (1996) 41, pp 313–357
Katz, Michael and Carl Shapiro, (1985), ”Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, vol. 75(3), pp. 424–440.
Klock Mark and D. Timothy McCormick. ”The Impact of market maker Competition on Nasdaq Spreads”, NASD Working Paper 98-01, August 1998
LaPlante, M.; Muscarella, C.J. ”Do Institutions Receive Comparable Execution In The Nyse And Nasdaq Markets? A Transaction Study Of Block Trades” Journal of Financial Economics 45 (1997) pp 97–134.
Reilly, Frank K., William C. Slaughter, ”The Effect of Dual Markets on Common Stock Market Making”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2. (Mar., 1973), pp. 167–182.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Regulation of Exchanges and Alternative Trading Systems. December 8, 1998. Effective Date: April 21, 1999
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benhamou, E., Serval, T. (2000). On the Competition between ECNs, Stock Markets and Market Makers. In: Bauknecht, K., Madria, S.K., Pernul, G. (eds) Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1875. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44463-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44463-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67981-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44463-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive