Skip to main content

Relativistic Effects in the Motion of the Moon

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Gyros, Clocks, Interferometers...: Testing Relativistic Graviy in Space

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 562))

Abstract

The main general relativistic effects in the motion of the Moon are briefly reviewed. The possibility of detection of the solar gravitomagnetic contributions to the mean motions of the lunar node and perigee is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.C. Gutzwiller: Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 589 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.O. Dickey et al.: Science 265, 482(1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Nordtvedt, these proceedings; Phys. Today 49, no. 5, 26 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Mashhoon and D.S. Theiss: Nuovo Cimento B 106, 545 (1991). A misprint in Eq. (64) of this paper should be corrected: The overall sign of the right-hand side of Eq. (64) should be negative. This correction would make that equation compatible with Eq. (8) of the present paper.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. de Sitter: Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 77, 155 (1916).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. I.I. Shapiro, R.D. Reasenberg, J.F. Chandler and R.W. Babcock: Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2643 (1988). See also B. Bertotti, I. Ciufolini and P.L. Bender: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1062(1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Mashhoon, H.J. Paik and C.M. Will: Phys. Rev. D 39, 2825 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C.A. Blockley and G.E. Stedman: Phys. Lett. A 147, 161 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Mashhoon and D.S. Theiss: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1542(1982); Phys. Lett. A 115, 333 (1986); B. Mashhoon: Gen. Rel. Grav. 16, 311 (1984).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D.S. Theiss, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cologne (Köln, 1984); Phys. Lett. A 109, 19, 23 (1985); in Relativistic Gravity Research, edited by J. Ehlers and G. Schäfer (Springer, Berlin, 1992), p. 131; in Proc. First William Fairbank Meeting on Relativistic Gravitational Experiments in Space, edited by M. Demianski and C.W.F. Everitt (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993), p. 227; in Proc. Seventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R.T. Jantzen and G. Mac Keiser (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), p. 1555, p. 1558.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Mashhoon: Found. Phys. 15 (Bergmann Festschrift), 497 (1985). In this paper a misprint in Eq. (22) must be corrected: r0 in the denominator of the last term must be replaced by c. Furthermore, in Eqs. (11) and (13) the temporal components must be divided by c.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. For the motion of the Earth about the Sun, α≈ 7°0, ∈ ≈ 10-8 and ξ ≈ 2 x 10-5 based on the standard value of solar angular momentum [cf. C.W. Allen, Astrophysical Quantities, 3rd ed. (Athlone, London, 1973)]. The Fermi frame adopted in this paper is such that the nutation vanishes at τ = 0. This frame can be obtained from the results given in Ref. [11]; see, especially, p. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The precise definition of the notion of a local geocentric frame was formulated in [11] and further developed in S.M. Kopeikin: Celestial Mech. 44, 87 (1988) and V.A. Brumberg and S.M. Kopeikin: Nuovo Cimento B 103, 63 (1989).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. It follows from a more complete treatment of the Newtonian problem that the mean motion of the lunar node can be characterized by a backward movement of frequency ω0N, which corresponds to a period of about 18.61 years. Similarly, the mean motion of the perigee can be characterized by a forward movement of frequency ω0P, which corresponds to a period of about 8.85 years. The theoretical expressions for N and P are rather complicated and depend on ω/Ω as well as the orbital eccentricities, etc. The first two terms of N and P in terms of ν =ω#x03A9;e given by \( N = 1 - 3v/8 - \cdot \cdot \cdot {\mathbf{ }}and{\mathbf{ }}P = 1 + 75v/8 + \cdot \cdot \cdot \) . A detailed discussion of this subtle problem is given by D. Brouwer and G.M. Clemence, Celestial Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1961), Ch.12, especially pp. 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mashhoon, B., Theiss, D.S. (2001). Relativistic Effects in the Motion of the Moon. In: Lämmerzahl, C., Everitt, C.W.F., Hehl, F.W. (eds) Gyros, Clocks, Interferometers...: Testing Relativistic Graviy in Space. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 562. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40988-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40988-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41236-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40988-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics