Syntactic and Semantic Graphics Recognition: The Role of the Object-Process Methodology
- 366 Downloads
Recognition of graphics is made at two levels: syntactic and semantic. Machines are already functioning at the syntactic level quite satisfactorily, but at the semantic level they still lack the intelligence and cognition humans apply while interpreting graphic symbols. Understanding and communicating the structure and behavior of complex systems through a graphic representation is effective only if it constitutes a visual formalism that assigns a definite semantics to each symbol. Object-Process Methodology (OPM) is a graphics-based visual formalism that has been applied to analyze and design systems in a variety of domains. Through a set of Object-Process Diagrams (OPDs) we specify a generic graphics recognition subsystem that is integrated into a Document Analysis System. Beside the direct value of the OPD representation, this model serves as an instance of the way OPM can be used as a concise graphic representation that unifies the structure and behavior of complex systems in general and graphics recognition systems in particular.
KeywordsGraphic Symbol Unify Modeling Language Semantic Level Computer Integrate Manufacture Syntactic Level
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Firlej, M. and Hellens, D. Knowledge Elicitation: a Practical Handbook. Prentice Hall, New York, p.144, 1991.Google Scholar
- 4.Harel, D., Biting the Silver Bullet: Toward a Brighter Future for System Development. Computer, pp. 8–20, Jan. 1992.Google Scholar
- 5.Wand, W. and Weber, R. An Ontological Evaluation of Systems Analysis and Design Methods. In Information System Concepts: An in-depth Analysis. E. D. Falkenberg and P. Lindgreen (Eds.). Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North Holland), pp. 145–172, IFIP 1989.Google Scholar
- 6.Bubenko, J. A. Jr.. Information System Methodologies-A Research Review. In T. W. Olle, H. G. Sol and A. A. Verrijn-Stuart (Eds.) Information System Design Methodologies-Improving the Practice. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North Holland), IFIP, pp. 289–318, 1986.Google Scholar
- 9.D. Dori, Unifying System Structure and Behavior through Object-Process Analysis. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, July-August, pp. 66–73, 1996.Google Scholar
- 10.D. Dori and Y. J. Dori, Object-Process Analysis of a Hypertext Organic Chemistry Studyware. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 1/2, (1996),65–84.Google Scholar
- 12.D. Meyersdorf and D. Dori, The R&D Universe and Its Feedback Cycles: an Object-Process Analysis. R&D Management, 27 (4), 333–344, 1997.Google Scholar
- 13.M. Peleg and D. Dori, Extending the Object-Process Methodology to Handle Real-Time Systems. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 11, 8, pp. 53–58, 1999.Google Scholar
- 17.D. Dori and H. Hel-Or: Semantic Content-Based Image Retrieval Using Object-Process Diagrams. In A. Amin, D. Dori, P. Pudil and H. Freeman (Eds.) Advances in Pattern Recognition, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1451, 230–241, 1998.Google Scholar