Skip to main content

Dependability Evaluation: Model and Method Based on Activity Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1943))

Abstract

Dependability Evaluation employs techniques for hardware and software assessment, and derived from these corresponding techniques for the assessment of human reliability. The most prominent shortcoming of such an approach is the lack of a sound psychological basis, and the restriction to operator actions, mostly disregarding organisational and communicational aspects. In this paper the activitytheoretic framework is used as a psychological basis, which allows to model complex systems in such a way that many aspects, which have formerly been studied separately, can be united. The derived method for dependability evaluation can be combined with and complemented by traditional approaches. The theory is illustrated with examples from an industrial case study in the railways sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. J. Bannon and S. Bødker. Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artefacts in Use. In J. Carroll, editor, Designing Interaction, chapter 12. Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Cacciabue. Human Reliability Assessment: Methods and Techniques. In F. Redmill and J. Rajan, editors, Human Factors in Safety-Critial Systems, chapter 3. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Cole. Cultural Psychology. Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Edwards. Introductory Overview. In E. L. Wiener and D. C. Nagel, editors, Human Factors in Aviation. San Diego: Academic Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Engestrøm. Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. L. Helmreich. Managing human error in aviation. Scientific American, pages 40–45, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Hollnagel. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method. Elsevier Science, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Hutchins. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi. The activity checklist: A tool for representing the space of context. Technical report, Department of Informatics, Umea University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. G. Kemeny. Report of the President’s Commission Three Mile Island. US Government Accounting Office, Washington, D. C., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. N. Leontev. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. G. Leveson. SAFEWARE: System Safety and Computers. Addison Wesley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. G. Leveson and C. Turner. An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, pages 18–43, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. R. Lyu. Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. McGraw-Hill, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Nardi. Context and Consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. USSR State Committee on the Utilisation of Atomic Energy. The accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and its consequences. Report presented at AIEA Experts Metting, Vienna, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. T. Reason. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. A. Sujan, A. Pasquini, A. Rizzo, P. Scrivani, and M. Wimmer. Activity theory as a framework to consider human affect in the design. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, volume 1, pages 726–731, Tokyo, Japan, October 1999. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. D. Swain and H. E. Guttman. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG CR-1278. SAND 80-0200 RX, AN. Final Report., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. S. Vygotsky. Mind in Society. Harward University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Wertsch. The Social Formation of Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Wimmer, A. Rizzo, and M. A. Sujan. A holistic design concept to improve safety related control systems. In Proceedings of the Safecomp 99, pages 297–309, Toulouse, France, September 1999. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sujan, MA., Rizzo, A., Pasquini, A. (2000). Dependability Evaluation: Model and Method Based on Activity Theory. In: Koornneef, F., van der Meulen, M. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability and Security. SAFECOMP 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1943. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40891-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40891-6_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41186-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40891-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics