Active Concealment for Internet Speech Transmission
Recently, active networks have been highlighted as a key enabling technology to obtain immense flexibility in terms of network deployment, configurability, and packet processing. Exploiting this flexibility, we present an active network application for real-time speech transmission where plugin modules are downloaded onto certain network nodes to perform application-specific packet processing. In particular, we propose to perform loss concealment algorithms for voice data streams at active network nodes to regenerate lost packets. The regenerated speech data streams are robust enough to tolerate further packet losses along the data path so that the concealment algorithms at another downstream node or at the receiver can still take effect. We call our approach active concealment for speech transmission to distinguish it from concealment performed at the receiver. Our approach is bandwidth-efficient and retains the applications’ end-to-end semantics.
KeywordsPacket Loss Packet Loss Rate Active Concealment Speech Quality Pitch Period
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.E. Amer, S. McCanne, and H. Zhang. An Application Level Video Gateway. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 95, San Francisco, CA, November 1995.Google Scholar
- 2.A. Banchs, W. Effelsberg, C. Tschudin, and V. Turau. Multicasting Multimedia Streams with Active Networks. In Proceedings IEEE Local Computer Network Conference LCN 98, Boston, MA, Oct 11–14, 1998, pp 150–159.Google Scholar
- 3.S. Bhattacharjee, K. L. Calvert, and E. W. Zegura. An Architecture for Active Networking. High Performance Networking (HPN 97), White Plains, NY, April 1997.Google Scholar
- 4.J. Gruber and L. Strawczynski. Subjective Effects of Variable Delay and Speech Clipping in Dynamically Managed Voice Systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. COM-33(8), August 1985.Google Scholar
- 6.R. Keller, S. Choi, D. Decasper, M. Dasen, G. Fankhauser, B. Plattner. An Active Router Architecture for Multicast Video Distribution. Proceedings IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.Google Scholar
- 7.L. Le. Development of a Loss-Resilient Internet Speech Transmission Method. Diploma thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University Berlin, June 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.H. Sanneck. Adaptive Loss Concealment for Internet Telephony Applications. Proceedings INET 98, Geneva/Switzerland, July 1998.Google Scholar
- 9.D. Tennenhouse, J. Smith, D. Sincoskie, D. Wetherall, G. Minden. A Survey of Active Network Research. IEEE Communications, January 1997.Google Scholar
- 10.R. Valenzuela and C. Animalu. A New Voice Packet Reconstruction Technique. Proceedings ICASSP, pages 1334–1336, May 1989.Google Scholar
- 11.W. Yang, K. R. Krishnamachari, and R. Yantorno. Improvement of the MBSD by Scaling Noise Masking Threshold and Correlation Analysis with MOS Difference instead of MOS. IEEE Speech Coding Workshop, 1999.Google Scholar
- 12.Hitachi SDL, GMD Fokus. BANG (Broadband Active Network Generation) project. Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar