Advertisement

SIMPLIcity: Semantics-sensitive Integrated Matching for Picture LIbraries

  • James Z. Wang
  • Jia Li
  • Gio Wiederholdy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1929)

Abstract

We present here SIMPLIcity (Semantics-sensitive Integrated Matching for Picture LIbraries), an image retrieval system using semantics classification and integrated region matching (IRM) based upon image segmentation. The SIMPLIcity system represents an image by a set of regions, roughly corresponding to objects, which are characterized by color, texture, shape, and location. The system classifies images into categories which are intended to distinguish semantically meaningful differences, such as textured versus nontextured, indoor versus outdoor, and graph versus photograph. Retrieval is enhanced by narrowing down the searching range in a database to a particular category and exploiting semantically-adaptive searching methods. A measure for the overall similarity between images, the IRM distance, is defined by a region-matching scheme that integrates properties of all the regions in the images. This overall similarity approach reduces the adverse effect of inaccurate segmentation, helps to clarify the semantics of a particular region, and enables a simple querying interface for region-based image retrieval systems. The application of SIMPLIcity to a database of about 200,000 general-purpose images demonstrates accurate retrieval at high speed. The system is also robust to image alterations.

Keywords

Image Database Color Histogram Semantic Type Matched Image Classi Cation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Bigun and J. M. H. du Buf, “N-folded symmetries by complex moments in Gabor space,” IEEE-PAMI, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Carson, M. Thomas, S. Belongie, J. M. Hellerstein, and J. Malik, “Blobworld: A system for region-based image indexing and retrieval,” Third Int. Conf. on Visual Information Systems, June 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets, Capital City Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Gupta and R. Jain, “Visual information retrieval,” Comm. Assoc. Comp. Mach., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 70–79, May 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Li, R. M. Gray, “Text and Picture Segmentation by the Distribution Analysis of Wavelet Coeffcients,” Int. Conf. Image Processing, Chicago, Oct. 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Li, J. Z. Wang, G. Wiederhold, “Classiffcation of Textured and Non-textured Images Using Region Segmentation,” Int. Conf. Image Processing, Vancouver, Canada, Sept. 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Li, J. Z. Wang, G. Wiederhold, “IRM: Integrated Region Matching for Image Retrieval,” ACM Multimedia Conf., Los Angeles, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Y. Ma and B. Manjunath, “NaTra: A toolbox for navigating large image databases,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing, pp. 568–71, Santa Barbara, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Niblack, R. Barber, W. Equitz, M. Flickner, E. Glasman, D. Petkovic, P. Yanker, C. Faloutsos, and G. Taubin, “The QBIC project: querying images by content using color, texture, and shape,” Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., in Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Database, vol. 1908, pp. 173–87, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Pentland, R. W. Picard, and S. Sclaroff, “Photobook: Content-based manipulation of image databases,” SPIE Storage and Retrieval Image and Video Databases II, San Jose, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Rubner, Perceptual Metrics for Image Database Navigation, Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, May 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Sheikholeslami, W. Chang, and A. Zhang, “Semantic clustering and querying on heterogeneous features for visual data,” ACM Multimedia, pp. 3–12, Bristol, UK, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. R. Smith and S.-F. Chang, “Visualseek: A fully automated content-based image query system,” Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. R. Smith and C. S. Li, “Image classi_cation and querying using composite region templates,” Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol.75, no.1–2, pp. 165–74, Academic Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Szummer and R. W. Picard, “Indoor-outdoor image classification,” Int. Workshop on Content-basedAccess of Image and Video Databases, pp. 42–51, Jan. 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Unser, “ Texture classification and segmentation using wavelet frames,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol.4, no. 11, pp. 1549–1560, Nov. 1995.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Vailaya, A. Jain, H. J. Zhang, “On image classification: city vs. landscape,” Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, pp. 3–8, Santa Barbara, CA, 1 June 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Z. Wang, G. Wiederhold, O. Firschein, and X. W. Sha, “Content-based image indexing and searching using Daubechies’ wavelets,” International Journal of Digital Libraries, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311–328, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Z. Wang, J. Li, G. Wiederhold, O. Firschein, “System for screening objection-able images,” Computer Communications Journal, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 1355–60, Elsevier Science, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Z. Wang, M. A. Fischler, “Visual similarity, judgmental certainty and stereo correspondence,” Proceedings of DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Morgan Kaufiman, Monterey, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Z. Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jia Li
    • 1
    • 3
  • Gio Wiederholdy
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Biomedical InformaticsStanford UniversityStanford
  3. 3.Xerox Palo Alto Research CenterStanford
  4. 4.Biomedical InformaticsStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations