Skip to main content

A Formal Ontology of Properties

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1937))

Abstract

A common problem of ontologies is that their taxonomic structure is often poor and confusing. This is typically exemplified by the unrestrained use of subsumption to accomplish a variety of tasks. In this paper we show how a formal ontology of unary properties can help using the subsumption relation in a disciplined way. This formal ontology is based on some meta-properties built around the fundamental philosophical notions of identity, unity, essence, and dependence. These meta-properties impose some constraints on the subsumption relation that clarify many misconceptions about taxonomies, facilitating their understanding, comparison and integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin, P. C., Menzel, C. P., Mayer, R. J., Fillion, F., Futrell, M. T., deWitte, P. S., and Lingineni, M. 1994. IDEF5 Method Report. Knowledge Based Systems, Inc., September 21, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guarino, N. 1992. Concepts, Attributes and Arbitrary Relations: Some Linguistic and Ontological Criteria for Structuring Knowledge Bases. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 8(2): 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guarino, N., Carrara, M., and Giaretta, P. 1994. An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (KR94). Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guarino, N. 1998. Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources. Proceedings of LREC-98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N. 1999. The Role of Identity Conditions in Ontology Design. In Proceedings of IJCAI-99 workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. Stockholm, Sweden, IJCAI, Inc.: 2-1 2-7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guarino, N., and Welty, C. 2000a. Identity, Unity, and Individuality: Towards a Formal Toolkit for Ontological Analysis. In Proceedings of ECAI-2000. IOS Press, Amsterdam. Available from http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/ontology/Papers/OntologyPapers.html.

  7. Guarino, N., and Welty, C. 2000b. Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. In Proceedings of ER-2000: The Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Available from http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/ontology/Papers/OntologyPapers.html.

  8. Guarino, N., and Welty, C. 2000c. Towards a methodology for ontology-based model engineering. In Proceedings of the ECOOP-2000 Workshop on Model Engineering. Available from http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/ontology/Papers/OntologyPapers.html.

  9. Hirst, G. 1991. Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation. Artificial Intelligence, 49: 199–242.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huitt, R., and Wilde, N. 1992. Maintenance Support for Object-Oriented Programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 18(12).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, D. 1983. New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61(4).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe, E. J. 1989. Kinds of Being. A Study of Individuation, Identity and the Logic of Sortal Terms. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simons, P. 1987. Parts: a Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steimann, F. 2000. On the Representation of Roles in OBject-Oriented and Conceptual Modelling. Data and Knowledge Engineering (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. 1996. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2): 93–136.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wieringa, R., De Jonge, W., and Spruit, P. 1994. Roles and dynamic subclasses: a modal logic approach. In Proceedings of European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiggins, D. 1980. Sameness and Substance. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guarino, N., Welty†, C. (2000). A Formal Ontology of Properties. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools. EKAW 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1937. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41119-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39967-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics