Abstract
In this paper, the concept of fairness as a future field of research in computer networks is investigated. We motivate the need of examining fairness issues by providing example future application scenarios where fairness support is needed in order to experience sufficient service quality. We further demonstrate how fairness definitions from political science and in computer networks are related and, finally, contribute with this work to the ongoing research activities by defining the fairness challenge with the purpose of helping direct future investigations to the white spots on the map of research in fairness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York, 1954. 209
D. K. Foley, “Resource allocation in the public sector,” Yale Econ. Essays, vol. 7, pp. 73–76, 1967. 210
Elisha A. Pazner, “Pitfalls in the Theory of Fairness,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 14, pp. 458–466, 1977. 210
H. Steinhaus, “Sur la division pragmatique,” Econometrica (supplement), vol. 17, pp. 315–319, 1949. 211
L. E. Dubins and E. H. Spanier, “How to cut a cake fairly,” American Mathematical Monthly, pp. 1–17, 1961. 211
Harold W. Kuhn, “On Games of Fair Division,” in Essays in Mathematical Economics, Martin Shubik, Ed. 1967, pp. 29–37, Princeton University Press. 211
Hal R. Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics-A Modern Approach, W.W. North & Company, New York/London, fifth edition, 1999. 211, 212
Scott Shenker, “Fundamental Design Issues for the Future Internet,” IEEE Journal Selected Areas Communication, vol. 13, pp. 1176–1188, 1995. 211, 214
K. J. Arrow and F. H. Hahn, General Competitive Analysis, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1971. 211
Hal R. Varian, “Distributive Justice, Welfare Economics, and the Theory of Fairness,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 223–247, 1975. 212
Hal R. Varian, Microeconomic Analysis, Norton, New York, third edition, 1992. 212
Donald Wittman, “A Diagrammatic Exposition of Justice,” Theory and Decision, vol. 11, pp. 207–237, 1979. 212
J. F. Nash, “The Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica, vol. 18, pp. 155–162, 1950. 213
J. Jaffe, “Bottleneck flow control,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 7, no. 29, pp. 954–962, July 1980. 213
D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager, Data Networks, Prentice Hall, 1987. 213
Frank P. Kelly, “Charging and rate control for elastic traffic,” European Transactions on Telecommunications, vol. 8, pp. 33–37, 1997. 213
Frank P. Kelly, A. K. Maulloo, and D. K. H. Tan, “Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 49, 1998. 214
L. Massoulié and J. Roberts, “Fairness and quality of service for elastic traffic,” CNET-France Tél’ecom, Feb. 1998. 214
Paul Hurley, Jean-Yves Le Boudec, and Patrick Thiran, “A Note on the Fairness of Additive Increase and Multiplicative Decrease,” in Proceedings of ITC-16, Edinburgh, June 1999. 214
Milan Vojnović, Jean-Yves Le Boudec, and Catherine Boutremans, “Global fairness of additive-increase and multiplicative-decrease with heterogeneous round-trip times,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM2000, March 2000. 214
J. R. Moorman and J. W. Lockwood, “Multiclass Priority Fair Queueing for Hybrid Wired/Wireless Quality of Service Support,” in Proceedings of WoWMoM99, Seattle, WA, Aug. 1999. 214
M. A. Marsan, A. Bianco, E. Leonardi, A. Morabito, and F. Neri, “All-Optical WDM Multi-Rings with Differentiated QoS,rd IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 58–66, Feb. 1999. 214
ATM Forum Traffic Management Working Group, ”ATM Forum Traffic Management Specification Version 4.1,“ ftp://ftp.atmforum.com/pub/approved-specs/aftm-0121.000.pdf , March 1999. 214
A. Demers, S. Keshav, and S. Shenker, “Analysis and Simulation of a Fair Queueing Algorithm,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’89, 1989, pp. 3–12. 214
A. K. Parekh and R. G. Gallager, “A Generalized Processor Sharing Approach to Flow Control-the Single Node Case,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’92, May 1992. 214, 215
Z. Wang, “User-Share Differentiation-Scalable Service Allocation for the Internet,” Internet Draft, Nov. 1997. 215
Y. Bernet et. al., “A framework for differentiated services,” Internet Draft, draftietf-diffserv-framework-01.txt, November 1998. 215
J. C. R. Bennett and H. Zhang, “WF2Q: Worst-case Fair Weighted Fair Queueing,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’96, March 1996, pp. 120–128. 215
S. Golestani, “A Self-clocked Fair Queueing Scheme for Broadband Applications,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’94, April 1994, pp. 636–646. 215
M. Shreedhar and G. Varghese, “Efficient Fair Queueing using Deficit Round Robin,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’95, September 1995, pp. 231–243. 215
S. Floyd and V. Jacobson, “Random early detection for congestion avoidance,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 397–413, July 1993. 215
Ion Stoica, Scott Shenker, and Hui Zhang, “Core-Stateless Fair Queueing: Achieving Approximately Fair Bandwidth Allocations in High Speed Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM’98, pp. 118–130, Oct. 1998. 215
Albert Banchs and Robert Denda, “SBSD: A Relative Differentiated Services Architecture based on Bandwidth Sares,” Tech. Rep., University of Mannheim, Germany, February 2000. 215
Albert Banchs and Robert Denda, “A Scalable Share Differentiation Architecture for Elastic and Real-Time Traffic,” in Proc. of the Eighth International Workshop on Quality of Service IWQoS 2000, Pittsburgh, PA USA, June 2000, pp. 42–51. 215
J. Mahdavi, “The TCP-friendly web site,” http://www.psc.edu/networking/tcp_friendly.html. 215
I. Rhee, N. Balaguru, and G. Rouskas, “MTCP: Scalable TCP-like Congestion Control for Reliable Multicast,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’99, New York, NY, Mar. 1999. 215
H. A. Wang and M. Schwartz, “Achieving Bounded Fairness for Multicast and TCP Traffic in the Internet,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’98, Vancouver, Canada, Sept. 1998. 216
S. Bhattacharyya, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose, “The Loss Path Multiplicity Problem for Multicast Congestion Control,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’99, New York, NY, Mar. 1999. 216
S. McCanne and V. Jacobson, “Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’96, Oct. 1996. 216
L. Vicisano, L. Rizzo, and J. Crowcroft, “TCP-like congestion control for layered multicast data transfer,” in Proceedings of INFOCOM’98, Mar. 1998, pp. 996–1003. 216
A. Banchs, W. Effelsberg, Ch. Tschudin, and V. Turau, “Active Multicasting of Multimedia Streams,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Local Computer Networks Conference LCN’98, October 1998, pp. 150–159. 216
D. Rubenstein, Jim Kurose, and Don Towsley, “The Impact of Multicast Layering on Network Fairness,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’99, Sept. 1999. 216
Christian Huitema, IPv6: The New Internet Protocol, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1996. 218
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Denda, R., Banchs, A., Effelsberg, W. (2000). The Fairness Challenge in Computer Networks. In: Crowcroft, J., Roberts, J., Smirnov, M.I. (eds) Quality of Future Internet Services. QofIS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1922. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39939-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39939-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41076-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39939-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive