Skip to main content

Operational Collision Avoidance with Regard to Catalog Objects

  • Chapter
Book cover Space Debris

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((ASTROENG))

Abstract

In previous chapters all collision flux estimates and corresponding collision probabilities were purely based on stochastic methods which did not consider the estimated orbital positions of objects. While orbits of the whole debris population were propagated across the historic evolution of the environment, the coarse first-order prediction methods were only used to derive time histories of spatial object densities and transient velocities in a gridded 3D control volume. Such statistical assessments are justified for small debris objects which were generated by stochastic release models into orbits with poorly known initial conditions. For larger-size objects, however, USSTRATCOM is maintaining a catalog of tracked objects (see Chapter 2), with routinely updated orbit information in a so-called Two-Line Element (TLE) format. When used with care, such data can be employed to improve the safety of operational spacecraft by means of a conjunction prediction and collision warning service for missions in densely populated orbital regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8.6 References

  • Alarcón, J. (2002). Development of a Collision Risk Assessment Tool. Technical Report (final report) ESA contract 14801/00/D/HK, GMV S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alby, F., Lansard, E., and Michal, T. (1997). Collision of Cerise with Space Debris. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, pages 589–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfriend, K., Akella, M., Lee, D., Frisbee, J., and Foster, J. (1999). Probability of Collision Error Analysis. Space Debris, vol.1, no.1:21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • anon. (2005). Accidential Collisions of Cataloged Satellites Identified. The Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 9, Issue 2:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendisch, J., Bunte, K., Sdunnus, H., Wegener, P., Walker, R., and Wiedemann, C. (2002). Upgrade of ESA’s MASTER Model. Technical Report (final report) ESA contract 14710/00/D/HK, ILR/TUBS, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérend, N. (1997). Étude de la Probabilité de Collision Entre un Satellite et des Débris Spatiaux. Technical Report no. RT 38/3605 SY, ONERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (1992). A Parametric Analysis of Orbital Debris Collision Probability and Maneuver Rate for Space Vehicles. Technical Report NASA JSC-25898, NASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (2001a). International Space Station Debris Avoidance Operations. The Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 6, Issue 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (2001b). The Analytical Basis for Debris Avoidance Operations of the International Space Station. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-473, pages 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoots, F., Crawford, L., and Roehrich, R. (1984). An Analytical Method to Determine Future Close Approaches Between Satellites. Celestial Mechanics, vol.33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoots, F. and Roehrich, R. (1980). Spacetrack Report No.3 — Models for the Propagation of NORAD Element Sets. Technical report, Office of Astrodynamics, Aerospace Defense Center, Peterson AFB, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khutorovsky, Z., Boikov, V., and Kamensky, S. (1993). Direct Method for the Analysis of Collision Probability of Artificial Space Objects in LEO — Techniques, Results, and Applications. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SD-01, pages 491–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkrad, H. (1997). One Year of Conjunction Events of ERS-1 and ERS-2 with Objects of the USSPACECOM Catalog. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, pages 601–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matney, N., Anz-Meador, P., and Foster, J. (2002). Covariance Correlations in Collision Avoidance Probability Calculations. COSPAR Congress, PEDAS1-B1.4-0038-02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck, O. and Gill, E. (2000). Satellite Orbits — Models, Methods, and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patera, R. (2001). General Method for Calculating Satellite Collision Probability. Journal of Guidance, Control & Dynamics, vol.24:716–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Ortiz, N., Belló-Mora, M., and Klinkrad, H. (2004). Collision Avoidance Maneuvers During Spacecraft Lifetime — Analysis of Operational Missions. 55th IAC Congress, IAC-04-IAA.5.12.5.10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinkrad, H., Alarcón, J., Sánchez, N. (2006). Operational Collision Avoidance with Regard to Catalog Objects. In: Space Debris. Springer Praxis Books. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37674-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37674-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25448-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37674-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics