Geometric Thickness of Complete Graphs

  • Michael B. Dillencourt
  • David Eppstein
  • DanielS. Hirschberg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1547)


We define the geometric thickness of a graph to be the smallest number of layers such that we can draw the graph in the plane with straight-line edges and assign each edge to a layer so that no two edges on the same layer cross. The geometric thickness lies between two previously studied quantities, the (graph-theoretical) thickness and the book thickness. We investigate the geometric thickness of the family of complete graphs, K n . We show that the geometric thickness of K n lies between ⌈(n/5.646) +0.342⌉ and ⌈n/4⌉, and we give exact values of the geometric thickness of K n for n ≤ 12 and n ∈ 15,16.


Convex Hull Complete Graph Outer Ring Layer Cross Planar Embedding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. [1]
    V. B. Alekseev and V. S. Gončakov. The thickness of an arbitrary complete graph. Math USSR Sbornik, 30(2):187–202, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. W. Beineke. The decomposition of complete graphs into planar subgraphs. In F. Harary, editor, Graph Theory and Theoretical Physics, chapter 4, pages 139–153. Academic Press, London, UK, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. W. Beineke and F. Harary. The thickness of the complete graph. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 17:850–859, 1965.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    F. Bernhart and P. C. Kainen. The book thickness of a graph. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B, 27:320–331, 1979.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Cimikowski. On heuristics for determining the thickness of a graph. Information Sciences, 85:87–98, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. M. Dean, J. P. Hutchinson, and E. R. Scheinerman. On the thickness and arboricity of a graph. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B, 52:147–151, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. H. Halton. On the thickness of graphs of given degree. Information Sciences, 54:219–238, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    N. Hartsfield and G. Ringel. Pearls in Graph Theory. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Jackson and G. Ringel. Plane constructions for graphs, networks, and maps: Measurements of planarity. In G. Hammer and Pallaschke D, editors, Selected Topics in Operations Research and Mathematical Economics: Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Operations Research, pages 315–324, Karlsruhe, West Germany, August 1983. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 226.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. C. Kainen. Thickness and coarseness of graphs. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, 39:88–95, 1973.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Mansfield. Determining the thickness of a graph is NP-hard. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 93(9):9–23, 1983.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Mayer. Decomposition de K16 en trois graphes planaires. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B, 13:71, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Vasak. The thickness of the complete graph having 6m + 4 points. Manuscript. Cited in [8, 9].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael B. Dillencourt
    • 1
  • David Eppstein
    • 1
  • DanielS. Hirschberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Information and Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations