Abstract
Chromosomal aberrations are differences in DNA sequence copy number of chromosome regions1. These differences may be crucial genetic events in the development and progression of human cancers. Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization is a laboratory method used in cancer research for the measurement of chromosomal aberrations in tumor genomes. A recurrent aberration at a particular genome location may indicate the presence of a tumor suppressor gene or an oncogene. The goal of the analysis of this type of data includes detection of locations of copy number changes, called breakpoints, and estimate of the values of the copy number value before and after a change. Knowing the exact locations of a breakpoint is important to identify possibly damaged genes. This paper introduces genetic local search algorithms to perform this task.
Aberrations can occur without change of copy number, but these aberrations are not the subject of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Akaike. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. Petrox and F. Caski, editors, Second International Symposium on Information Theory, page 267, 1973.
J. Fridlyand. Personal communication, 2002.
A. N. Jain, T. A. Tokuyasu, A. M. Snijders, R. Segraves, D. G. Albertson, and D. Pinkel. Fully automatic quantification of microarray image data. Genome research, 12:325–332, 2002.
P. Moscato. On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms. Technical report, Caltech Concurrent Computation Program, Californian Institute of Technology, U.S.A., TR No790 1989.
D. Pinkel, R. Segraves, D. Sudar, S. Clark, I. Poole, D. Kowbel, C. Collins, W.L. Kuo, C. Chen, Y. Zhai, S.H. Dairkee, B.M. Ljung, J.W. Gray, and D.G. Albertson. High resolution analysis of dna copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics, 20, 1998.
J.A. Rice. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis Second Edition. Duxbury Press, 1995.
G. Schwarz. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461–464, 1978.
A.M. Snijders, N. Nowak, R. Segraves, S. Blackwood, N. Brown, J. Conroy, G. Hamilton, A.K. Hindle, B. Huey, K. Kimura, S. Law, K. Myambo, J. Palmer, B. Ylstra, J.P. Yue, J.W. Gray, A.N. Jain, D. Pinkel, and D.G. Albertson. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of dna copy number by cgh. Nature Genetics, 29:263–264, 2001.
M.M. Weiss, E.J. Kuipers, C. Postma, A. M. Snijders, I. Siccama, D. Pinkel, J. Westerga, S.G.M. Meuwissen, D. G. Albertson, and G.A. Meijer. Genomic profiling of gastric cancer predicts lymph node status survival. Oncogene, 2003. In press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jong, K., Marchiori, E., van der Vaart, A., Ylstra, B., Weiss, M., Meijer, G. (2003). Chromosomal Breakpoint Detection in Human Cancer. In: Cagnoni, S., et al. Applications of Evolutionary Computing. EvoWorkshops 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2611. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36605-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36605-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00976-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36605-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive