Advertisement

MusicBlox: A Real-Time Algorithmic Composition System Incorporating a Distributed Interactive Genetic Algorithm

  • Andrew Gartland-Jones
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2611)

Abstract

This paper discusses the motivation, design and construction of a generative music system, ‘MusicBlox’, (by the author) that utilises a domain specific, knowledge rich Genetic Algorithm (GA). The paper begins by describing the functionality and musical aims of the project, and goes on to detail the implementation of a GA as part of the project’s compositional sub-system, including a discussion of the suitability of using a GA for compositional tasks. The paper concludes that the developed GA is able to produce musically successful results, but that significant additional work still needs to be undertaken before it achieves all the aims outlined.

Keywords

Composition System Genetic Algorithm Model Musical Style Musical Object Interactive Genetic Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boden, M. Computer Models of Creativity, in Handbook of Creativity, ed. Sternberg, R. J. Cambridge University Press (1999). ISBN 0-521-57604-0.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cope, D. Computers and Musical Style (1991). ISBN 0-89579-256-7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hiller, L, & Issacson, L. Musical Composition with a High-Speed Digital Computer, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society (1958).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miranda, E, R. On the Origins and Evolution of Music in Virtual Worlds, in Creative Evolutionary Systems, ed. Bentley, P, Corne, D, Academic Press (2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burton Anthony R, & Vladimirova, T. Generation of Musical Sequences with Genetic Techniques. Computer Music Journal. Volume: 23 Number: 4 pp. 59–73, (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen, H. A self-Defining Game for One Player: On the Nature of Creativity and the Possibility of Creative Computer Programs. Leonardo, Vol. 35, No1, pp. 59–64, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biles, John. A. GenJam: A Genetic Algorithm for Generating Jazz Solos. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 94 (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biles, John. A. GenJam in Transition: from Genetic Jammer to Generative Jammer. Proceeding of Generative Art 2002, Milan 11–13 December (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiggins, G. Papadopoulos, G. Phon-Amnuaisuk, S, Tuson, A. Evolutionary Methods for Musical Composition. Proceedings of the CASYS98 Workshop on Anticipation, Music & Cognition, Liège(1998).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horner, A. and Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms and computer-assisted music composition. Technical report, University of Illinois (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ralley, D. Genetic Algorithms as a Tool for Melodic Development. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 95 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Gartland-Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Computational Creativity Research GroupThe University of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations