Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Objective versus Subjective Coordination in the Engineering of Agent Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Information Agents

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2586))

Abstract

The governance of interaction is a critical issue in the engineering of agent systems. Research on coordination addresses this issue by providing a wide range of models, abstractions and technologies. It is often the case, however, that such a wide range of proposals could not easily find an unitary and coherent conceptual framework where all the different views and solutions can be understood and compared - and this is particularly true in the context of agent models and systems.

In this paper, we first discuss how all the many diverse approaches to agent coordination can be categorised in two main classes - the subjective and objective approaches – depending on whether they adopt the agent’s or the engineer’s viewpoint, respectively. We then claim that the two approaches have a deep and different impact on the way in which agent systems are modelled and built, and show two examples rooted in different models and technologies. Finally, we advocate that both approaches play a fundamental role in the engineering of agent systems, and that any methodology for the design and development of agent systems has to exploit both objective and subjective coordination models and technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nadia Busi, Paolo Ciancarini, Roberto Gorrieri, and Gianluigi Zavattaro. Coordination models: A guided tour. In Omicini et al. [17], chapter 1, pages 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fabio Casati, Silvana Castano, Mariagrazia Fugini, Isabel Mirabel, and Barbara Pernici. Using patterns to design rules in workflows. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(8):760–785, August 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paolo Ciancarini and Michael J. Wooldridge, editors. Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, volume 1957 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, January 2001. 1st International Workshop (AOSE 2000), Limerick, Ireland, 10 June 2000, Revised Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  4. José Cuena and Sascha Ossowski. Distributed models for decision support. In Gerhard Weiss, editor, Multiagent Systems-A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 459–504. MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keith Decker. TÆMS: A framework for environment centered analysis and design of coordination mechanisms. In Gregory M. P. O'Hare and Nicholas R. Jennings, editors, Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 429–448. John Wiley and Sons, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enrico Denti, Andrea Omicini, and Alessandro Ricci. Coordination tools for MAS development and deployment. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16(10), November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin Fredriksson, Rune Gustavsson, and Alessandro Ricci. Sustainable coordination. Springer-Verlag, 2002. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David Gelernter. Generative communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(1):80–112, 1985.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthias Klusch and Katia Sycara. Brokering and matchmaking for coordination of agent societies: A survey. In Omicini et al. [17], chapter 8, pages 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Victor R. Lesser. Reflections on the nature of multi-agent coordination and its implications for an agent architecture. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(1):89–111, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas Malone and Kevin Crowston. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1):87–119, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. John F. Nash. The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 28:152–155, 1950.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Allen Newell. Reflections on the knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 59:31–38, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrea Omicini. SODA: Societies and infrastructures in the analysis and design of agent-based systems. In Ciancarini and Wooldridge [3], pages 185–193. 1st International Workshop (AOSE 2000), Limerick, Ireland, 10 June 2000, Revised Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andrea Omicini and Enrico Denti. Formal ReSpecT. In Agostino Dovier, Maria Chiara Meo, and Andrea Omicini, editors, Declarative Programming-Selected Papers from AGP’00, volume 48 of Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 179–196. Elsevier Science B. V., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrea Omicini and Enrico Denti. From tuple spaces to tuple centres. Science of Computer Programming, 41(3):277–294, November 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrea Omicini, Franco Zambonelli, Matthias Klusch, and Robert Tolksdorf, editors. Coordination of Internet Agents: Models, Technologies, and Applications. Springer-Verlag, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sascha Ossowski. Coordination in Artificial Agent Societies-Social Structure and its Implications for Autonomus Problem-solving Agents, volume 1535 of LNAI. Springer, Berlin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sascha Ossowski. Constraint-based coordination of autonomous agents. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 48, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sascha Ossowski, Josefa Z. Hernández, Carlos A. Iglesias, and Alberto Fernández. Engineering agent systems for decision support. In Paolo Petta, Robert Tolksdorf, and Franco Zambonelli, editors, Engineering Societies in an Agent World III. Springer-Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sunju Park, Edmund H. Durfee, and William P. Birmingham. Emergent properties of a market-based digital library with strategic agents. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 5:33–51, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alessandro Ricci, Andrea Omicini, and Enrico Denti. Virtual enterprises and work-flow management as agent coordination issues. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 11(3/4):355–380, September/December 2002. Cooperative Information Agents: Best Papers of CIA 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffrey S. Rosenschein and Gilad Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter-Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation Among Computers. MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michael Schumacher. Objective Coordination in Multi-Agent System Engineering-Design and Implementation, volume 2039 of LNAI. Springer-Verlag, April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reid G. Smith. The Contract Net Protocol: High level communication and control in distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 29(12):1104–1113, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. William L. Thomson. Cooperative models of bargaining. In R. Aumann and S. Hart, editors, Handbook of Game Theory, pages 1238–1284. North-Holland, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robert Tolksdorf. Models of coordination. In Andrea Omicini, Franco Zambonelli, and Robert Tolksdorf, editors, Engineering Societies in an Agent World. Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mirko Viroli and Andrea Omicini. Coordination as a service: Ontological and formal foundation. In Antonio Brogi and Jean-Marie Jacquet, editors, Foundations of Coordination Languages and Software Architectures-Papers from FOCLASA’02, volume 68 of Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. Elsevier Science B. V., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Frank von Martial. Co-ordinating Plans of Autonomous Agents, volume 661 of Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Peter Wegner. Why interaction is more powerful than computing. Communications of the ACM, 40(5):80–91, May 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Michael J. Wooldridge and Nicholas R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2):115–152, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Michael J. Wooldridge, Gerhard Weiss, and Paolo Ciancarini, editors. Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II,volume 2222 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, January 2002. 2nd International Workshop (AOSE 2001), Montreal, Canada, 29 May 2001, Revised Papers and Invited Contributions.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Franco Zambonelli, Nicholas R. Jennings, Andrea Omicini, and Michael J. Wooldridge. Agent-oriented software engineering for Internet applications. In Omicini et al. [17], chapter 13, pages 326–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DEIS, Università di Bologna a Cesena, Via Rasi e Spinelli 176, 47023, Cesena, FC, Italy

    Andrea Omicini

  2. ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Campus de Mostoles, Calle Tulipan s/n, E-28933, Madrid, Spain

    Sascha Ossowski

Authors
  1. Andrea Omicini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sascha Ossowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. German Research Center for Artifical Intelligence Multiagent Systems Group, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Matthias Klusch

  2. Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Vignolese 905, 41100, Modena, Italy

    Sonia Bergamaschi

  3. Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen King’s College, AB24 5UE, Aberdeen, UK

    Pete Edwards

  4. Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Schottengasse 3, 1010, Vienna, Austria

    Paolo Petta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Omicini, A., Ossowski, S. (2003). Objective versus Subjective Coordination in the Engineering of Agent Systems. In: Klusch, M., Bergamaschi, S., Edwards, P., Petta, P. (eds) Intelligent Information Agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2586. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36561-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36561-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00759-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36561-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation