Skip to main content

Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web, Web-Services, and Database Systems (NODe 2002)

Abstract

Recently, schema matching has found considerable interest in both research and practice. Determining matching components of database or XML schemas is needed in many applications, e.g. for E-business and data integration. Various schema matching systems have been developed to solve the problem semi-automatically. While there have been some evaluations, the overall effectiveness of currently available automatic schema matching systems is largely unclear. This is because the evaluations were conducted in diverse ways making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of each single system, let alone to compare their effectiveness. In this paper we survey recently published schema matching evaluations. For this purpose, we introduce the major criteria that influence the effectiveness of a schema matching approach and use these criteria to compare the various systems. Based on our observations, we discuss the requirements for future match implementations and evaluations.

The authors did not give a name to their system, so we refer to it in this paper using the initials of the authors’ names.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andritsos, P. et al: Schema Management. IEEE Bulletin on Data Engineering 25: 3, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berlin, J., A. Motro: Autoplex: Automated Discovery of Content for Virtual Databases. CoopIS 2001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berlin, J., A. Motro: Database Schema Matching Using Machine Learning with Feature Selection. CAiSE 2002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergamaschi, S., S. Castano, M. Vincini, D. Beneventano: Semantic integration of heterogeneous information sources. Data & Knowledge Engineering 36: 3, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castano, S., V. De Antonellis: A Schema Analysis and Reconciliation Tool Environment. IDEAS 1999

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clifton, C., E. Housman, A. Rosenthal: Experience with a Combined Approach to Attribute-Matching Across Heterogeneous Databases. IFIP 2.6 Working Conf. Database Semantics 1996

    Google Scholar 

  7. Do, H.H., E. Rahm: COMA-A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approach. VLDB 2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doan, A.H., P. Domingos, A. Halevy: Reconciling Schemas of Disparate Data Sources: A Machine-Learning Approach. SIGMOD 2001

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doan, A.H., J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, A. Halevy: Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. WWW 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. Embley, D.W., D. Jackman, L. Xu: Multifaceted Exploitation of Metadata for Attribute Match Discovery in Information Integration. WIIW 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, W.S., C. Clifton: Semantic Integration in Heterogeneous Databases Using Neural Networks. VLDB 1994

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, W.S., C. Clifton: SemInt: A Tool for Identifying Attribute Correspondences in Heterogeneous Databases Using Neural Network. Data and Knowledge Engineering 33: 1, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, W.S., C. Clifton, S.Y. Liu: Database Integration Using Neural Networks: Implementation and Experiences. Knowledge and Information Systems 2: 1, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Madhavan, J., P.A. Bernstein, E. Rahm: Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. VLDB 2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melnik, S., H. Garcia-Molina, E. Rahm: Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm. ICDE 2002

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milo, T., S. Zohar: Using Schema Matching to Simplify Heterogeneous Data Translation. VLDB 1998, 122–133

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitra, P., G. Wiederhold, J. Jannink: Semi-automatic Integration of Knowledge Sources. Fusion 1999

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naumann, F., C.T. Ho, X. Tian, L. Haas, N. Megiddo: Attribute Classification Using Feature Analysis. ICDE 2002 (Poster)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palopoli, L., G. Terracina, D. Ursino: The System DIKE: Towards the Semi-Automatic Synthesis of Cooperative Information Systems and Data Warehouses. ADBIS-DASFAA 2000

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rahm, E., P.A. Bernstein: A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. VLDB Journal 10: 4, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. 2nd edition, 1979, London, Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Do, HH., Melnik, S., Rahm, E. (2003). Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations. In: Chaudhri, A.B., Jeckle, M., Rahm, E., Unland, R. (eds) Web, Web-Services, and Database Systems. NODe 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2593. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36560-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36560-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00745-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36560-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics