Advertisement

Multi-user Evaluation of XML Data Management Systems with XMach-1

  • Timo Böhme
  • Erhard Rahm
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2590)

Abstract

XMach-1 was the first XML data management benchmark designed for general applicability [1]. It is still the only benchmark supporting a multi-user performance evaluation of XML database systems. After a brief review of XMach-1 we summarize three additionally proposed benchmarks (XMark, XOO7, Mbench) and provide a comparison between these benchmarks. We then present experiences and performance results from evaluating XML database systems with XMach-1.

Keywords

Database Size Query Processor Query Operation Evaluation Scope Navigational Query 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Böhme, T.; Rahm, E.: XMach-1: A Benchmark for XML Data Management. In Proceedings of German database conference BTW2001, pp. 264–273, Springer, Berlin, March 2001.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Florescu, D.; Kossmann, D.: Storing and Querying XML Data using an RDMBS. In: IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, Volume 22, Number 3, pp. 27–34, September 1999.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Florescu, D.; Kossmann, D.; Manolescu, I.: Integrating Keyword Search into XML Query Processing. In: Proc. of the 9th WWW Conference, Amsterdam, June 2000.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Böhme, T.; Rahm, E.: Benchmarking XML Data Management Systems. http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/en/projekte/XML/XmlBenchmarking.html, June 2002.
  5. [5]
    Schmidt, A.; Waas, F.; Kersten, M. L.; Florescu, D.; Manolescu, I.; Carey, M.J.; Busse, R.: The XML Benchmark Project. Technical Report INS-R0103, CWI, Amsterdam, Niederlande, April 2001.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schmidt, A.; Waas, F.; Kersten, M. L.; Florescu, D.; Carey, M. J.; Manolescu, I.; Busse, R.: Why And How To Benchmark XML Databases. SIGMOD Record, Volume 30, Number 3, pp. 27–32, September 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Schmidt, A.; Waas, F.; Kersten, M. L.; Carey, M. J.; Manolescu, I., Busse, R.: XMark: A Benchmark for XML Data Management. In Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference, Hong Kong, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. [9]
    Carey, M. J.; DeWitt, D. J.; Naughton, J. F.: The OO7 Benchmark. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp.12–21, June 1993.Google Scholar
  9. [10]
    Runapongsa, K.; Patel, J. M.; Jagadish, H. V.; Al-Khalifa, S.: The Michigan Benchmark. http://www.eecs.umich.edu/db/mbench/description.html, 2002.
  10. [11]
    Böhme, T.; Rahm, E.: Benchmarking XML Database Systems. First Experiences. Ninth International Workshop on High Performance Transaction Systems (HPTS), Pacific Grove, California, October 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timo Böhme
    • 1
  • Erhard Rahm
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations