Advertisement

Agent-Oriented Software Technologies: Flaws and Remedies

  • Jörg P. Müller
  • Bernhard Bauer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2585)

Abstract

Agent-Oriented Software Technologies, i.e., the engineering of agent systems, agent languages, development tools, and methodologies, are an active research area. However, the practical influence of AOST on what we call mainstream software technologies is very small. As of today, trends in software technologies are not made by agent researchers or companies, but rather by Microsoft and Sun Microsystems. In this position paper, we investigate basic questions: Why are agent-oriented software technologies currently not fully exploiting their potential? Is there another “CORBA syndrome” lurking behind the next corner? And what can we do to better position agent software technologies in the market, and to increase their practical impact?

We are convinced that the most severe problems in today’s agent-oriented software technologies and in the way we market them are due to a few basic flaws. In this paper, we will try to identify and discuss these flaws. However, it is also our firm belief that agent-oriented software technologies have a huge potential, and that there are remedies that can be applied to cure the flaws. We shall also identify some of these potential remedies and formulate them as recommendations.

Keywords

Software Technology Multiagent System Agent Technology Interaction Protocol Agent Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 5.
    Alves-Foss, J., editor, Formal Syntax and Semantics of Java, LNCS 1523, Springer, Berlin, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. In: Scientific American, Issue 05/01, online available at http://www.sciam.com/2001/0501issue/0501berners-lee.html, 2001.
  3. 11.
    Bussmann, S., Schild, K.: An Agent-based Approach to the Control of Flexible Production Systems. In: Proc. of the 8th IEEE Int. Conf. on Emergent Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 2001), pp.481–488 (Vol.2). Antibes Juan-les-pins, France, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 17.
    d'Inverno, M., Kinny, D., Luck, M. and Wooldridge, M.: A formal specification of dMARS. In: Intelligent Agents IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, LNAI 1365, pp. 155–176. Springer, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 18.
    Dorigo, M.: Ant algorithms solve difficult optimization problems. in: Advances in Artificial Life, 6th European Conference, ECAL 2001, LNAI 2159, pages 11–22, Springer, Berlin, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 24.
    Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Procedural Knowledge. In: Proc. Of the IEEE Special Issue on Knowledge Representation, volume 74, pp. 1383–1398, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 28.
    Jennings, N.R, Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.J.: A roadmap of agent research and development. In: International Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1, pp. 275–306, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 30.
    Kinny, D., Georgeff, M.P.: Modelling and Design of Multi-Agent Systems. In: Müller, J.P., Wooldridge M.W., Jennings, N.R., editors, Intelligent Agents III, pp. 1–20, Springer, Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 31.
    Lesperance, Y., Levesque, H.J., Lin, F., Marcu, D., Reiter, R., Scherl, R. B.: Foundations of a logical approach to agent programming. In: Intelligent Agents II, pp. 331–346, LNAI 1037, Springer, Berlin, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 35.
    Müller, J.P.: The Design of Intelligent Agents. LNAI 1177. Springer, Berlin, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 36.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T., Sycara, S.: Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. In: Proc. of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference, online available at http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents/daml_Mmaker/daml-s_matchmaker.htm, 2002.
  12. 37.
    Petta, P., Müller, J.P.: Guest Editorial, Engineering Agent Systems: Best of ‘From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation (AT2AI) 3’ Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16, 2002, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. 39.
    Rao,_A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: R. Fikes and E. Sandewall, editors, Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 473–484, Morgan-Kaufmann,1991.Google Scholar
  14. 49.
    Wooldridge, M.J.: An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley&Sons, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg P. Müller
    • 1
  • Bernhard Bauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Siemens AG, Corporate TechnologyIntelligent Autonomous SystemsMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations