Advertisement

CFAR Processors in Pulse Jamming

  • Ivan Garvanov
  • Vera Behar
  • Christo Kabakchiev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2542)

Abstract

In this paper we study the efficiency of CA CFAR BI, EXC CFAR BI and Adaptive CFAR PI detectors in strong pulse jamming. We achieve new results for the average decision threshold (ADT) using the minimum detectable signal (Pd=0.5). For comparison we use also the approach with Monte-Karlo simulation for estimation of the ADT of the studied CFAR detectors. Differently from other authors, we consider the entire range (0 to 1) of the probability for the appearance of pulse jamming in range cells.

Keywords

False Alarm Range Cell Constant False Alarm Rate Radar Signal Detection Reference Window 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Finn H., Johnson P.: Adaptive detection mode with threshold control as a function of spatially sampled clutter estimation, RCA Review, vol. 29, No 3, (1968) 414–464Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rohling H.: Radar CFAR Thresholding in Clutter and Multiple Target Situations, IEEE Trans., vol. AES-19, No 4, (1983) 608–621Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gandhi P., Kassam S.: Analysis of CFAR processors in nonhomogeneous background, IEEE Trans., vol. AES-24, No 4, (1988) 443–454Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Himonas S., Barkat M.: Automatic Censored CFAR Detection for Non-homogeneous Environments, IEEE Trans., vol. AES-28, No 1, (1992) 286–304Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Himonas S.: CFAR Integration Processors in Randomly Arriving Impulse Interference, IEEE Trans., vol. AES-30, No 3, (1994) 809–816Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldman H.: Analysis and application of the excision CFAR detector, IEE Proceedings, vol.135, No 6, (1988) 563–575Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Behar V., Kabakchiev C.: Excision CFAR Binary Integration Processors, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., vol. 49, No 11/12, (1996) 45–48Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabakchiev C., Behar V.: CFAR Radar Image Detection in Pulse Jamming, IEEE Fourth Int. Symp. ISSSTA’96, Mainz, Germany, (1996) 182–185Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Behar V.: CA CFAR radar signal detection in pulse jamming, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., vol. 49, No 7/8, (1996) 57–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kabakchiev C., Behar V.: Techniques for CFAR Radar Image Detection in Pulse Jamming, IEEE Fourth Int. Symp. EUM’96, Praga,Cheh Republic, (1996) 347–352Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Behar V., Kabakchiev C., Dukovska L.: Adaptive CFAR Processor for Radar Target Detection in Pulse Jamming, Journal of VLSI Signal Processong, vol. 26, No 11/12, (2000) 383–396zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kabakchiev C., Dukovska L., Garvanov I.: Comparative Analysis of Losses of CA CFAR Processors in Pulse Jamming, CIT, No 1, (2001) 21–35Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garvanov I., Kabakchiev C.: Average decision threshold of CA CFAR and excision CFAR detectors in the presence of strong pulse jamming, German Radar Symposium 2002, (GRS 2002), Bonn, Germany, September (2002), (submitted for presentation)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chakarov V.: Adaptive CFAR processor for radar target detection design of SHARC signal processor, PhD thesis, Technical University-Sofia, (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akimov P., Evstratov F., Zaharov S.: Radio Signal Detection, Moscow, Radio and Communication, 1989, pp. 195–203, (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Garvanov
    • 1
  • Vera Behar
    • 2
  • Christo Kabakchiev
    • 1
  1. 1.Bulgarian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Information TechnologiesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Dep. of Biomedical EngineeringInstitute of TechnologyHaifa

Personalised recommendations