Advertisement

An Introduction to the Theory of Plausible and Paradoxical Reasoning

  • Jean Dezert
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2542)

Abstract

This paper presents the basic mathematical settings of a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning and describes a rule of combination of sources of information in a very general framework where information can be both uncertain and paradoxical. Within this framework, the rule of combination which takes into account explicitly both conjunctions and disjunctions of assertions in the fusion process, appears to be more simple and general than the Dempster’s rule of combination. Through two simple examples, we show the strong ability of this new theory to solve practical but difficult problems where the Dempster-Shafer theory usually fails.

Keywords

Basic Belief Belief Function Information Granule Focal Element Basic Probability Assignment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cheng Y., Kashyap R.L., “Study of the Different Methods for Combining Evidence”, Proceedings of SPIE on Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 635, pp. 384–393, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dedekind R.,” Über Zerlegungen von Zhalen durch ihre grössten gemeinsammen Teiler”, In Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 1., pp. 103–148, 1897.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dezert J., “Autonomous Navigation with Uncertain Reference Points using the PDAF”, Chapter 9 in Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Applications and Advances, Vol. 2, pp. 271–324, Y. Bar-Shalom Editor, Artech House, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dezert J., “Optimal Bayesian Fusion of Multiple Unreliable Classifiers”, Proceedings of 4th Intern. Conf. on Information Fusion (Fusion 2001), Montréal, Aug. 7–10, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dezert J., “Foundations for a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning”, To appear in next issue of the International Journal of Information & Security, edited by Prof. Tzv. Semerdjiev, CLPP, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 40 pages, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubois D., Prade H.,“Théories des Possibilités. Application à la Représentation des Connaissances en Informatique”, Editions Masson, Paris, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubois D., Garbolino P., Kyburg H.E., Prade H., Smets, Ph., “Quantified Uncertainty”, J. Applied Non-Classical Logics, Vol.1, pp. 105–197, 1991.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klawonn F., Smets Ph., “The dynamic of belief in the transferable belief model and specialization-generalization matrices”, in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 92, pp 130–137, Dubois D. and Wellman M. P. and D'Ambrosio B. and Smet, Ph. Editors, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, Ca, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahler R., “Combining Ambiguous Evidence with Respect to Abiguous a priori Knowledge, I: Boolean Logic”, IEEE Trans. on SMC, Part 1: Systems and Humans, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 27–41, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shafer G., “A Mathematical Theory of Evidence”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1976.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shafer G., Tversky A., “Languages and designs for probability”, Cognitive Sc., Vol.9, pp. 309–339, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smarandache F., “An Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic”, (Second Edition), American Research Press, Rehoboth, 2000 (ISBN 1-879585-76-6).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smets Ph.,“The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model”, IEEE Trans. on PAMI, Vol. 12, no. 5, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smets Ph.,“The alpha-junctions: combination operators applicable to belief function”, Qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning, Springer, Gabbay D.M and Kruse R. and Nonnengart A. and Ohlbach H.J. Editors, pp. 131–153, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smets Ph.,“The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation”, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, D. M. Gabbay and Ph. Smets (Editors), Vol. 1, Kluwer, Doordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smets Ph., “Data Fusion in the Transferable Belief Model”, Proceedings of 3rd Int. Conf. on Inf. Fusion (Fusion 2000), pp. PS–21–PS33, Paris, July 10–13, 2000 (http://www.onera.fr/fusion2000)
  17. 17.
    Sun H., he K., Zhang B.,“The Performance of Fusion Judgment on Dempster-Shafer Rule”, Chinese Journal of Electronics, Vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zadeh L.A.,“A Theory of Approximate Reasoning” Machine Intelligence, J. Hayes, D. Michie and L. Mikulich Eds, Vol. 9, pp. 149–194, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Dezert
    • 1
  1. 1.DTIM/IEDOneraChâtillonFrance

Personalised recommendations