Skip to main content

Towards an Ideal Social Simulation Language

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II (MABS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2581))

Abstract

The problem of social simulation is analysed, identifying what I call ‘syntactic’ and ‘semantic’ complexity. These mean that social simulation has particular needs in terms of computational tools. I suggest an approach where one identifies, documents and checks constraints from a variety of sources. Eight criteria for a computational tool to support social simulation are proposed and illustrated using the language SDML. I speculate that a general tool for developing, running and comparing sets of models and results could greatly aid social simulation. This would help manage the clusters of closely related models that social systems seem to necessitate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R., Epstein, J. M. and Cohen, M. D. (1996) Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axtell, R. L. and J. M. Epstein (1994). Agent-based Modelling: Understanding our Creations. The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute 9: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brazier, F. M. T., Dunin-Keplicz, B. M., Jennings, N. R. and Treur, J. (1997), DESIRE: Modelling Multi-Agent Systems in a Compositional Formal Framework, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 6:67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conte, R., Hegselman, R. and Terna, P. (1997) Simulating Social Phenomena, Springer: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 456.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R., J. Fox, et al. (1997). A Systematic Methodology for Cognitive Modelling. Artificial Intelligence 85: 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edmonds, B. (1999). Pragmatic Holism. Foundations of Science 4:57–82.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Edmonds, B. (1999). Syntactic Measures of Complexity. Doctoral Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edmonds, B. (2000). The Use of Models-making MABS actually work. In S. Moss and P. Davidsson (eds.) Multi Agent Based Simulation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1979:15–3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Giere Ronald, N. (1988). Explaining science: a cognitive approach. Chicago; London, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert, N. (1995) Emergence in Social Simulation. In (Gilbert and Conte 1995), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbert, N. and Doran, J. (1994) Simulating societies: the computer simulation of social phenomena. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert, N. and Conte, R. (1995) Artificial societies: the computer simulation of social life. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holland John, H. (1998). Emergence: from chaos to order. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Konolige, K. (1992). Autoepistemic Logic. In D. Gabbay, C. Hogger and J. Robinson. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol. 3. Oxford, Clarendon. 217–295.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lakatos, I. (1983). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mariotto, M. B., Nuno, D., Sichman, J. S. and Coelho, H. (2002) Requirements Analysis of Agent-Based Simulation Platforms: State of the Art and New Prospects, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moss, S., H. Gaylard, & al. (1996). SDML: A Multi-Agent Language for Organizational Modelling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 4(1): 43–69.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schelling, Thomas C. (1971). Dynamic Models of Segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1:143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon, H.A. (1986). The failure of armchair economics [Interview]. Challenge, 29(5), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suppes, P. (1962). Models of Data. In Nagel, E. et al. (eds.) Logic Methodology and the Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Conference. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 252–261.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terán, O., Edmonds, B. & Wallis, S. (2001) Mapping the Envelope of Social Simulation Trajectories. Multi Agent Based Simulation 2000 (MABS2000), Boston, MA, July, 2000. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1979:229–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Edmonds, B. (2003). Towards an Ideal Social Simulation Language. In: Simão Sichman, J., Bousquet, F., Davidsson, P. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II. MABS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2581. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00607-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36483-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics