Abstract
We consider Robert Axelrod’s tribute model at the light shed by the development of a choice framework called BVG (beliefs, values and goals). BVG agents use multi-varied, situated and individual rationality to perform adaptive choices in social environments. We then take the original experiment and carry it over using this choice scheme. By explicitly representing the agents preferences and the related decisional mechanisms, we are able to easily extend the experiment to tackle issues only implicitly addressed. The outcome of these new experiments is somewhat surprising, and seems to undermine the original conclusions. The experiments were carried out in a similar way to that of the original ones. However, we sustain that a more holistic attitude towards experimentation may be preferable. We conclude by arguing that the model of multiple values may help to principle the relation between experimenter and experiment, through the strengthening of bridges between the design of the experiment and the design of the agents involved in the simulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Antunes. Agents with Value-based Decision (Agentes com Decisão baseada em Valores). PhD thesis, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 2001.
L. Antunes, J. Faria, and H. Coelho. Improving choice mechanisms within the BVG architecture. In Y. Lésperance and C. Castelfranchi, editors, Intelligent Agents VII, Proc. of ATAL2000, volume 1986 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
R. Axelrod. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, 1984.
R. Axelrod. A model of the emergence of new political actors. In N. Gilbert and R. Conte, editors, Artificial societies: the computer simulation of social life. UCL Press, London, 1995.
J. C. Caldas and H. Coelho. Strategic interaction in oligopolistic markets — experimenting with real and artificial agents. In C. Castelfranchi and E. Werner, editors, Artificial Social Systems, Proc. of MAAMAW’92, volume 830 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
J.-L. Deneubourg, S. Goss, N. R. Franks, A. Sendova-Franks, C. Detrain, and L. Chretien. The dynamics of collective sorting: Robot-like ant and ant-like robot. In J.-A. Meyer and S. W. Wilson, editors, Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: From Animals to Animats, pages 356–365. The MIT Press/Bradford Books, 1991.
A. Sloman. Prospects for AI as the general science of intelligence. In A. Sloman, D. Hogg, G. Humphreys, A. Ramsay, and D. Partridge, editors, Prospects for Artificial Intelligence, Proc. of AISB’93, Amsterdam, 1993. IOS Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Antunes, L., Nóbrega, L., Coelho, H. (2003). BVG Choice in Axelrod’s Tribute Model. In: Simão Sichman, J., Bousquet, F., Davidsson, P. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II. MABS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2581. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00607-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36483-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive