Advertisement

Meta-information for Multimedia eLearning

  • Ralf Steinmetz
  • Cornelia Seeberg
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2598)

Abstract

The generation of multimedia learning objects are expansive and time consuming. Only by reusing them in many contexts, the effort becomes worth while. Reusing requires a flexible layout. Therefore content and format should be separated. Means for searching relevant learning object are of highest importance. Metainformation has to be added to the learning object. Metadata and especially learning metadata are a powerful instrument. Complemented by an ontology and relations between the learning object, the learning material become findable. For supporting the authors, tools like a metadata editor are necessary.

Keywords

Learning Material Metadata Scheme Metadata Record Rhetorical Structure Theory Learn Object Metadata 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [6]
    T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. [7]
    A. El Saddik: Interactive Multimedia Learning. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. 2001.Google Scholar
  3. [8]
    A. Faatz, S. Hörmann, C. Seeberg, and R. Steinmetz: Conceptual Enrichment of Ontolo-gies by means of a generic and configurable approach. In In Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Semantic Knowledge Acquisition and Categorisation. 2001.Google Scholar
  4. [9]
    A. Faatz, C. Seeberg, and. Steinmetz: Ontology Enrichment with Texts from the WWW. In Proceedings of ECML-Semantic Web Mining 2002. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. 2002.Google Scholar
  5. [10]
    S. Hörmann, C. Seeberg, and A. Faatz: Verwendung von LOM in k-MED. Technical Report, KOM, DarmstadtUnivresity of Technology. TR-KOM-2002-02. Darmstadt. 2002.Google Scholar
  6. [11]
    S. Hörmann, A. Faatz, O. Merkel, A. Hugo, and R. Steinmetz: Ein Kurseditor für modul-arisierte Lernressourcen auf der Basis von Learning Objects Metadata zur Erstellung von adaptierbaren Kursen. In LLWA 01-Tagungsband der GI-Workshopwoche “Lernen-Lehren-Wissen-Adaptivität”. Ralf Klinkenberg, Stefan Rueping, Andreas Fick, Nicola Henze, Christian Herzog, Ralf Molitor, Olaf Schroeder (Eds), 2001. Research Report #763.Google Scholar
  7. [12]
    S. Hörmann and R. Steinmetz:. k-MED: Kurse gestalten und adaptieren mit rhetorisch-didaktischen Relationen. In Rechnergestützte Lehr-und Lernsysteme in der Medizin. J. Bernauer and M. R. Fischer and F. J. Leven and F. Puppe and M. Weber. 2002.Google Scholar
  8. [14]
    W. C. Mann, and S. A. Thomson: Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organiza-tion. Technical Report RS-87-190, Information Science Institute, USC ISI, USA. 1987.Google Scholar
  9. [15]
    C. Seeberg: Life Long Learning. Modulare Wissensbasen für elektronische lernumgebun-gen. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. 2002.Google Scholar
  10. [16]
    A: Steinacker: Medienbausteine für web-basierte Lernsysteme. Dissertation, D17 Darm-stadt University of Technology. Darmstadt, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. [17]
    A. Steinacker, A. Ghavam, and R. Steinmetz: Metadata Standards for Web-based Re-sources. IEEE Multimedia, 8(1):70–76, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [18]
    W3C: “Metadata Activity Statement”; http://www.w3.org/Metadata/Activity.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Steinmetz
    • 1
  • Cornelia Seeberg
    • 1
  1. 1.KOM, Darmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations