Advertisement

Duplication-Based Scheduling Algorithm for Interconnection-Constrained Distributed Memory Machines

  • Savina Bansal
  • Padam Kumar
  • Kuldip Singh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2552)

Abstract

Duplication-based scheduling techniques are more appropriate for fine grain task graphs and for networks with high communication latencies. However, most of the algorithms are developed under the assumption of fully connected processor network and with prohibitively high O(v4) time complexity. An insertion based duplication algorithm is proposed for precedence constrained task graphs, for working with limited interconnection constrained processors. It duplicates only the most important immediate parents of a task, that too if critical. Results are presented for benchmark random task graphs, having widely varying shape and cost parameters for the clique, Hypercube and an extensible and fault tolerant binary de Bruijn (undirected) multiprocessor network. The average performance degradation, due to interconnection constraints, is about 21% in comparison to fully connected processor network. Further, the schedules generated on the fixed degree binary de-Bruijn network are within 5% of the schedules on Hypercube network, whose degree keeps on increasing with size.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gerasoulis, A., Yang, T.: A Comparison of Clustering Heuristics for Scheduling Directed Acyclic Graphs onto Multiprocessors. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 16 (1992) 276–291zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kruatrachue, B., Lewis, T.G.: Grain Size Determination for Parallel Processing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering(1988) 23–32Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sih, G.C., Lee, E.A.: A Compile-Time Scheduling Heuristic for Interconnection Constrained Heterogeneous Processor Architectures. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.4 (1993) 75–87Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rewini, H.El., Lewis, T.G., Ali, H.H.: Task Scheduling in Parallel and Distributed Systems. Prentice Hall, NJ (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed, I., Kwok, Y.K.: On Exploiting Task Duplication in Parallel Program Scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (1998) 872–892Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dikaiakos, M.D., et. al.: A Comparative Study of Heuristics for Mapping Parallel Algorithms to Message Passing Multiprocessors. Tech. Report Princeton University (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, W.H. Freeman and Co. (1979)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, M.Y., Gajski, D.S.: Hypertool: A Programming Aid for Message-Passing Systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 1(1990) 330–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu, M.Y., Shu, W., Gu, J.: Efficient Local Search for DAG Scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 12 (2001) 617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sevalkumar, S., Ramamoorthy, C.V.: Scheduling Precedence Constrained Task Graphs with Non-Negligible Inter Task Communication onto Multiprocessors. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (1994) 328–336Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darbha, S., Agrawal, D.P.: Optimal Scheduling Algorithm for Distributed Memory Machines, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed systems (1998) 87–95Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang T., Gerasoulis, A.: DSC: Scheduling Parallel Tasks on an Unbounded Number of Processors. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 5 (1994) 951–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwok, Y.K., Ahmad, I.: Benchmarking and Comparison of the Task Graph Scheduling Algorithms. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 59 (1999) 381–422zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samatham, M.R., Pradhan, D.K.: The de Bruijn Multiprocessor Network: A Versatile Parallel Processing and Sorting Network for VLSI. IEEE Transactions on Computers 38 (1989) 567–581zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bansal, S., Kumar, P., Singh, K.: A Cost-effective Scheduling Algorithm for Message Passing Multiprocessor Systems. (Accepted for publication in Proc. PDCS-2002, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Sept. 19-21, 2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Savina Bansal
    • 1
  • Padam Kumar
    • 1
  • Kuldip Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Electronics & Computer EngineeringIIT, RoorkeeRoorkee (Uttranchal)INDIA

Personalised recommendations