Advertisement

An Empirical Evaluation of the Interactive Visualization of Metadata to Support Document Use

  • Mischa Weiss-Lijn
  • Janet T. McDonnell
  • Leslie James
Chapter
  • 738 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2539)

Abstract

Digital Libraries currently focus on delivering documents. Since information needs are often satisfied at the sub-document level, digital libraries should explore ways to support document use as well as retrieval. This paper describes the design and initial evaluation of a technology being developed for document use. It uses interactive visualization of paragraph level metadata to allow rapid goal-directed search and navigation within documents. An experimental evaluation of a prototype’s performance on representative work tasks is described. Quantitative analysis finds that the prototype does not increase performance. However, qualitative analysis of the data suggests that there is room for performance improvements and has inspired design changes to realize this potential.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B. L., O’Hara, K., and Sellen, A. A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices. 241–248 1998. Conf. Proc. On Human factors in computing systems.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgman, C. L. Final Report, UCLA-NSF, Social Aspects of Digital Libraries Workshop. 1996. Social Aspects of Digital Libraries Workshop. http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/research/dl/UCLA_DL_Report.html.
  3. 3.
    Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., and Shneiderman, B. Information visualization: Using vision to think. 1999. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, J. M. Five reasons for scenario based design. Interacting with Computers 13, 43–60 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Egan, D. E., Remde, J. R., Gomez, L. M., Landauer, T. K., Eberhardt, J., and Lochbaum, C. C. Formative design evaluation of SuperBook. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 7(1), 30–57 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hearst, M. TileBars: Visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. 59–66 1995. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver, CO, ACM Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hornbæk, K. and Frøkjaer, E. Reading Electronic Documents: The Usability of Linear, Fisheye, and Overview+Detail Interfaces. 293–300 2001. Proceedings of CHI’2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howell, D. C. Statistical methods for psychology. 1997. Wadsworth publishing company.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Janney, K. and Sledge, J. A user model for CIMI Z39.50 application profile. CHIO 9/1995. http://www.cimi.org/old_site/documents/Z3950_app_profile_0995.html.
  10. 11.
    Kando, N. NTCIR Workshop: Japanese-and Chinese-English cross-lingual information retrieval and multi-grade relevance judgments. 24–33 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2069. Lisbon, Portugal, Springer.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Van House, N. A. User needs assessment and evaluation for the UC Berkeley electronic environmental library project. 1995. Digital Libraries’ 95: The 2nd Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Van Rijsbergen, C. J. Information Retrieval, edition 2 1979. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Veerasamy, A. and Heikes, R. Effectiveness of a Graphical Display of retrieval results. 1997. SIGIR97. ACM Press.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Weiss-Lijn, M., McDonnell, J. T., and James, L. Interactive visualization of paragraph-level metadata to support corporate document use. Visualising the Semantic Web. 11/2002. (Eds). Geroimenko, V. and Chaomei, C. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mischa Weiss-Lijn
    • 1
  • Janet T. McDonnell
    • 1
  • Leslie James
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.J Sainsbury plcLondonUK

Personalised recommendations