Advertisement

Programmable Resource Discovery Using Peer-to-Peer Networks

  • Paul Smith
  • Steven Simpson
  • David Hutchison
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2546)

Abstract

Some forms of programmable networks such as funnelWeb allow service components to be deployed discretely (i.e. out-of-band) on a suitable configuration of elements, but do not define mechanisms to determine such configurations.

We present a mechanism to resolve arbitrary service-specific deployment constraints into a suitable node configuration. To focus constraint resolution, we arrange programmable elements into an overlay, and use this to interpolate/extrapolate more favourable locations. Programmable service components are used to evaluate suitability of individual nodes.

Keywords

Overlay Network Programmable Element Service Component Service Deployment Constraint Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. [CSWH01]
    I. Clarke, Oskar. S., B. Wiley, and T.W. Hong. Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System. In H. Federrath, editor, Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies: International Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, volume 2009 of LNCS, New York, 2001. Springer.Google Scholar
  2. [FG98]
    M. Fry and A. Ghosh. Application Level Active Networking. In Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. [GF97]
    A. Ghosh and M. Fry. Javaradio: an application level active network. In Third International Workshop on High Performance Protocols (HIPPARCH’ 97), London, June 1997.Google Scholar
  4. [GFC00]
    A. Ghosh, M. Fry, and J. Crowcroft. An Architecture for Application Layer Routing. In IWAN 2000, Tokyo, Japan, October 2000.Google Scholar
  5. [MCSH02]
    L. Mathy, R. Canonic, S. Simpson, and D. Hutchison. Scalable Adaptive Hierarchical Clustering. IEEE Communications Letters, 6(3):117–119, March 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [RD01]
    A. Rowstron and P. Drushcel. Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In IFIP/ACM Middleware 2001, Heidelberg, Germany, November 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [RFH+01]
    S. Ratnasamy, P. Francis, M. Handley, R. Karp, and S Shenker. A Scalable Content-Addressable Network. In ACM Sigcomm 2001, August 2001.Google Scholar
  8. [RHKS02]
    S. Ratnasmay, M. Handley, R. Karp, and S. Shenker. Topologically-Aware Overlay Construction and Server Selection. In IEEE INFOCOM 2002, June 2002.Google Scholar
  9. [SBSH01]
    S. Simpson, M. Banfield, P. Smith, and D. Hutchison. Component Selection for Heterogeneous Active Networking. volume 2207 of LNCS, pages 84–100. Springer, September/October 2001.Google Scholar
  10. [SMCH01]
    P. Smith, L. Mathy, R. Canonico, and D. Hutchison. ALM and ProgNets for v4-to-v6 Multicast Transition. In IEEE OpenArch 2001-Short Paper Session “Ghosts of the Net!”, Anchorage, Alaska, April 2001.Google Scholar
  11. [Wet99]
    D. Wetherall. Active network vision and reality: lessons from a capsule-based system. In Operating Systems Review, volume 34(5), pages 64–79, December 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [WGT99]
    D. Wetherall, J. Guttag, and D. Tennenhouse. ANTS: Network Services Without the Red Tape. IEEE Computer, 32(4):42–49, April 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Smith
    • 1
  • Steven Simpson
    • 1
  • David Hutchison
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing DepartmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations