Skip to main content

Prototypes of Biological Movements in Brains and Machines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (BMCV 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2525))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2804 Accesses

Abstract

Biological movements and actions are important visual stimuli. Their recognition is a highly relevant problem for biological as well as for technical systems. In the domain of stationary object recognition the concept of a prototype-based representation of object shape has been quite inspiring for research in computer vision as well as in neuroscience. The paper presents an overview of some recent work aiming at a generalization of such concepts for the domain of complex movements. First, a technical method is presented that allows to represent classes of complex movements by linear combinations of learned example trajectories. Applications of this method in computer vision and computer graphics are briefly discussed. The relevance of prototype-based representations for the recognition of complex movements in the visual cortex is discussed in the second part of the paper. By devising a simple neurophysiologically plausible model it is demonstrated that many experimental findings on the visual recognition of “biological motion” can be accounted for by a neural representation of learned prototypical motion patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D Beymer and T Poggio. Image representations for visual learning. Science, 272:1905–1909, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V Blanz and T Vetter. Morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 99, Los Angeles, pages 187–194, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M Brand. Style machines. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, New Orleans, Lousiana, USA, pages 23–28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Bruderlin and L Williams. Motion signal processing. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 95, Los Angeles, pages 97–104, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H H Bülthoff and S Edelman. Psychophysical support for a 2D-view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 89:60–64, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J E Cutting and L T Kozlowski. Recognising friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9:353–356, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S Edelman. Representation and Recognition in Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D M Gavrila. The visual analysis of human movement: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73:82–98, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. M A Giese. Dynamit neural model for the recognition of biological motion. In H Neumann and G Barato., editors, Dynamische Perzeption 9, pages 829–835. In.x, Sankt Augustin, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M A Giese and M Lappe. Measuring generalization fields of biological motion. Vision Research, 42:1847–1858, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M A Giese and T Poggio. Morphable models for the analysis and Synthesis of complex motion Pattern. International Journal of Computer Vision, 38:59–73, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M A Giese and T Poggio. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements and actions. Nature Neuroscience, (submitted), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M A Giese and L M Vaina. Pathways in the analysis of biological motion: computational model and fMRI results. Perception, 30 (Suppl.):ll6, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G Johansson. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14:201–211, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M J Jones and T Poggio. Multidimensional morphable models: A framework for representing and matching object classes. International Journal of Computer Vision, 29:107–131, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J Lee and S Y Shin. A hierarchical approach to interactive motion editing for human-like figures. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 99, Los Angeles, pages 39–48, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N K Logothetis, J Pauls, and T Poggio. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5:552–563, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S E Palmer. Vision Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D I Perrett, P A J Smith, A J Mistlin, A J Chitty, A S Head, D D Potter, Broennimann R, A D Milner, and M A Jeeves. Visual analysis of body movements by neurons in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: a preliminary report. Behavioral Brain Research, 16:153–170, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T Poggio and S Edelman. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343:263–266, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M K Riesenhuber and T Poggio. A hierarchical model for visual object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11:1019–1025, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S Ullman and R Basri. Recognition by linear combination of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, 13:992–1006, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T Valentine. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and rate in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A:161–204, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T Vetter and T Poggio. Linear object classes and image synthesis from a single example. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, 19(7):733–742, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. X Xie and M A Giese. Nonlinear dynamics of direction-selective recurrent neural media. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 65 (5 Pt 1):051904, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y Yacoob and M J Black. Parameterized modeling and recognition of activities. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, (in press), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giese, M.A. (2002). Prototypes of Biological Movements in Brains and Machines. In: Bülthoff, H.H., Wallraven, C., Lee, SW., Poggio, T.A. (eds) Biologically Motivated Computer Vision. BMCV 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2525. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36181-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics