Skip to main content

The Hierarchical Watershed Partitioning and Data Simplification of River Network

  • Chapter
Progress in Spatial Data Handling

Abstract

For the generalization of river network, the importance decision of river channels in a catchment has to consider three aspects at different levels: the spatial distribution pattern at macro level, the distribution density at meso level and the individual geometric properties at micro level. To extract such structured information, this study builds the model of watershed hierarchical partitioning based on Delaunay triangulation. The watershed area is determined by the spatial competition process applying the partitioning similar to Voronoi diagram to obtain the basin polygon of each river channel. The hierarchical relation is constructed to represent the inclusion between different level watersheds. This model supports to compute the parameters such as distribution density, distance between neighbor channels and the hierarchical watershed area. The study presents a method to select the river network by the watershed area threshold. The experiment on real river data shows this method has good generalization effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ai T, Oosterom P van (2002) GAP-tree Extensions Based on Skeletons. In: Richardson D, Oosterom P van (eds) Advances in Spatial Data Handling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 501–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Ai T, Guo R, Liu Y (2000) A Binary Tree Representation of Bend Hierarchical Structure Based on Gestalt Principles. In: Proc of the 9th Int Symp on Spatial Data Handling, Beijing, pp 2a30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Band LE (1986) Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models. Water Resource Research 22(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassel KE, Weibel R (1988) A Review and Framework of Automated Map Generalization. Int J of Geographical Information Systems 2(3):229–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosion Development of Streams and Drainage Basins: Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56(3):275–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CB, Bundy GL, Ware JM (1995) Map Generalization With A Triangulated Data Structure. Cartography and Geographic Information System 22(4): 317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva J, Egenhofer MJ (2000) Robust Inference of the Flow Direction in River Networks. Algorithmica 26(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plazanet C, Bigolin NM, Ruas A (1998) Experiment with Learning Techniques for Spatial Model Enrichment and Line Generalization. Geoinformatica 2(4): 315–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorten P, Jones CB (1999) Customisable Line Generalization Using Delaunay Triangulation. In: CD-Rom Proc of the 19th ICC, Ottawa, Canada, Section 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DE (1993) Automatic Spatial and Thematic Generalization using a Context Trans-formation Model. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros DD, Borga M (1997) Use of Digital Elevation Model Data for the Derivation of the Geomorphological Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph. Hydrological Process 11:13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso R, Bacchi B, La Barbera P (1991) Fractal Relation of Mainstream Length to Catchment Area in River Networks. Water Resource Research 27:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sester M (2000) Generalization Based on Least Squares Adjustment. In: IAPRS Vol XXXIII, Part B4/3, Comm IV, pp 931–938, ISPRS Congress, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson RC, Brooks R (2000) Efficient Generalization and Abstraction of Network Data Using Perceptual Grouping. In: Proc of the 5th Int Conf on Geo-Computation

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer F, Pillewizer W (1966) The principles of selection: a means of cartographic generalization. The Cartographic J 3(1):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe A (1992) Automated Recognition of Valley Lines and Drainage Networks from Grid Digital Elevation Models: A Review and a New Method. J of Hydrology 139:263–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf GW (1998) Weighted Surface Networks and Their Application to Cartographic Generalization. In: Barth W (ed) Visualization Technology and Algorithm. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H (1997) Structured Approach to Implementing Automatic Cartographic Generalization. In: Proc of the 18th ICC, Stockholm, Sweden, vol 1, pp 349–356

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ai, T., Liu, Y., Chen, J. (2006). The Hierarchical Watershed Partitioning and Data Simplification of River Network. In: Riedl, A., Kainz, W., Elmes, G.A. (eds) Progress in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35589-8_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics