Abstract
Problems from plastic limit load or shakedown analysis and optimal plastic design are based on the convex yield criterion and the linear equilibrium equation for the generic stress (state) vector σ. The state or performance function s*(y, x) is defined by the minimum value function of a convex or linear program based on the basic safety conditions of plasticity theory: A safe (stress) state exists then if and only if s* < 0, and a safe stress state cannot be guaranteed if and only if s* ≥ 0. Hence, the probability of survival can be represented by p s = P(s*(y(ω), x) < 0).
Using FORM, the probability of survival is approximated then by the well-known formula p s ∼ φ (||z*x||) where ||z*x|| denotes the length of a so-called β-point, hence, a projection of the origin 0 to the failure domain (transformed to the space of normal distributed model parameters z(ω) = T(y(ω))). Moreover, φ = φ(t)denotes the distribution function of the standard N(0,1) normal distribution. Thus, the basic reliability condition, used e.g. in reliability-based optimal plastic design or in limit load analysis problems, reads ||z*x|| ≥ ω −1(α s) with a prescribed minimum probability α s. While in general the computation of the projection z*x is very difficult, in the present case of elastoplastic structures, by means of the state function s* = s*(y, x) this can be done very efficiently: Using the available necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for the convex or linear optimization problem representing the state function s* = s*(y, x), an explicit parameter optimization problem can be derived for the computation of a design point z*x. Simplifications are obtained in the standard case of piecewise linearization of the yield surfaces.
In addition, several different response surface methods including the standard response surface method are also applied to compute a β-point z*x in order to reduce the computational time as well as having more accurate results than the first order approximation methods by using the obtained response surface function with any simulation methods such as Monte Carlo Simulation. However, for the problems having a polygon type limit state function, the standard response surface methods can not approximate well enough. Thus, a response surface method based on the piecewise regression has been developed for such problems. Applications of the methods developed to several types of structures are presented for the examples given in this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bucher, C.G; Bourgand, U.: Efficient Use of Response Surface Methods. Report No. 9-87, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, University of Innsbruck, Austria, 1987.
Kaymaz, I.; McMahon C. A.: A Response Surface Method Based on Weighted Regression for Structural Reliability Analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 20(1), 11–17, 2005.
Kleinbaum, D. G.; Kuper, L. L.; Muller K. E.: Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston, 1987.
Kreyszig, E.: Advanced Engineering Mathematics. John Wiley & Sons, Singapore, 1993.
Marti, K.: Optimal Design of Trusses as a Stochastic Linear Programming Problem. In: Noval, A.S.(ed.): Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 231–239, 1999.
Marti, K.: Optimal Structural Design under Stochastic Uncertainty by Stochastic Linear Programming Methods. Journal on Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety (RESS) 72(3a), 165–177, 2001.
Marti, K.: Optimal Engineering Design by Means of Stochastic Optimization Methods. In: J. Blachut, H.A. Eschenauer (eds.): Emerging Methods for Treating Multidisciplinary Optimization Problems. CISM Courses and Lectures 425, Springer-Verlag, Wien-New York, 107–158, 2001.
Marti, K.: Plastic Structural Analysis under Stochastic Uncertainty. MCMDS 9(3), 303–325, 2003.
Marti, K.: Stochastic Optimization Methods in Optimal Engineering Design under Stochastic Uncertainty. ZAMM 83(12), 795–811, 2003.
Marti, K.: Stochastic optimization Methods in plastic analysis and optimal plastic design. In: B.H.V. Topping (ed.): Progress in Civil and Structural Engineering Computing. Saxe-Coburg Publ., Stirling, Scotland, UK, 171–189, 2003.
Marti, K.: Reliability-based plastic analysis and design. In: Maes, M.A., Huyse, L. (eds.): Reliabilty and Optimization of Structural Systems. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Leiden (etc.), 377–383, 2004
McMahon, C. A.; Browne, J.: CADCAM: Principles, Practice and Manufacturing Management.: Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 1998.
Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C.: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kaymaz, I., Marti, K. (2006). Explicit Methods for the Computation of Structural Reliabilities in Stochastic Plastic Analysis. In: Coping with Uncertainty. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 581. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35262-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35262-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35258-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35262-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)