Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stereopsis in Teleophthalmology

  • Chapter
Teleophthalmology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group (2001) The Age-Related Eye Disease Study system for classifying age-related macular degeneration from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study report 6. Am J Ophthalmol 132(5):668–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DCCTR group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329(14):977–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DRSR group (1981) Diabetic retinopathy study report number 7: a modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 21(1 Pt 2):210–226

    Google Scholar 

  4. ETDR study group (1991) Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification, ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology 98(5):786–806

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein R, Klein B, Moss S, Davis M, DeMets D (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy II: prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol 102(4):520–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein R, Klein B, Moss S, Davis M, DeMets D (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy III: prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 102(4):527–532

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond JP, McKinnon M, Barry C, Geary D, McAllister IL, House P, Constable IJ (1998) Nonmydriatic fundus photography: a viable alternative to fundoscopy for identification of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal population in rural Western Australia? Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 26(2):109–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harper CA, Livingston PM, Wood C, Jin C, Lee SJ, Keeffe JE, McCarty CA, Taylor HR (1998) Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a non-mydriatic retinal camera in rural Victoria. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 26(2):117–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgs ER, Harney BA, Kelleher A, Reckless JP (1991) Detection of diabetic retinopathy in the community using a non-mydriatic camera. Diabet Med 8(6):551–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leese GP, Newton RW, Jung RT, Haining W, Ellingford A (1992) Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a widely spaced population using non-mydriatic fundus photography in a mobile unit. Diabet Med 9(5):459–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohan R, Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Nijhar I, Mohan V, Mather HM (1988) Evaluation of a nonmydriatic camera in Indian and European diabetic patients. Brit J Ophthalmol 72(11):841–845

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Owens DR, Gibbins RL, Lewis PA, Wall S, Allen JC, Morton R (1998) Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies? Diabet Med 15(2):170–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Penman AD, Saaddine JB, Hegazy M, Sous ES, Ali MA, Brechner RJ, Herman WH, Engelgau MM, Klein R (1998) Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults. Diabet Med 15(9):783–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WM, Alberti KG, Brackenridge RG, Stephenson P, Young E (1990) Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. Br Med J 301:1243–1247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boucher MC, Gresset JA, Angioi K, Olivier S (2003) Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields. Can J Ophthalmol 38(7):557–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen AB, Sander B, Larsen M, Kleener J, Borch-Johnsen K, Klein R, Lund-Andersen H (2004) Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 82(6):656–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maberley D, Cruess AF, Barile G, Slakter J (2002) Digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in the James Bay Cree. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 9(3):169–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, Aiello LM (2001) Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108(3):572–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fransen S, Leonard-Martin T, Feuer W, Hildebrand P (2002) Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology 109(3):595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tennant M, Greve M, Rudnisky C, Hillson T, Hinz B (2001) Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Can J Ophthalmol 36(4):187–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong D (1982) Textbook of ophthalmic photography. AL: Inter-Optics Publications, Birmingham, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maberley D, Morris A, Hay D, Chang A, Hall L, Mandava N (2004) A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 11(3):191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenfield DS, Zacharia P, Schuman JS (1993) Comparison of Nidek 3Dx and Donaldson simultaneous stereoscopic disk photography. Am J Ophthalmol 116(6):741–747

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiri A, Dyer DS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Schachat AP (1996) Detection of diabetic macular edema: Nidek 3Dx stereophotography compared with fundus biomicroscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 122(5):654–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saine PJ, Tyler ME (2002) Ophthalmic Photography: Retinal Photography, Angiography, and Electronic Imaging, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 97–136

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baker CF, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Sanghera P, Hinz BJ, De Leon AR, Greve MD (2004) JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 39(7):746–754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rudnisky C, Hinz B, Tennant M, DeLeon A, Greve M (2002) High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema. Ophthalmology 109(2):267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tennant M, Rudnisky C, Hinz B, MacDonald I, Greve M (2000) Teleophthalmology via stereoscopic digital imaging: a pilot project. Diabetes Technol Ther 2(4):583–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, Hubbard LD, Meuer SM, Brothers RJ (1985) Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 92(4):485–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Perrier M, Boucher MC, Angioi K, Gresset JA, Olivier S (2003) Comparison of two, three and four 45° image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 38(7):569–574

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Anonymous (2003) Current state and future direction of teleophthalmology in Canada: first Canadian ophthalmic telemedicine symposium. Can J Ophthalmol 38(5):349–351

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bresnick G, Mukamel D, Dickinson J, Cole D (2000) A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology 107(1):19–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9, Canada

    Chris J. Rudnisky

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5H 3V9, Canada

    Matthew T. S. Tennant

Authors
  1. Chris J. Rudnisky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew T. S. Tennant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Excellence in E-Medicine, University of Western Australia, Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, 6009, WA, Australia

    Kanagasingam Yogesan PhD (Professor in Ophthalmology and Director) & Sajeesh Kumar PhD (Professor in Ophthalmology and Director) & 

  2. Telehealth and Medical Informatics, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, 94304, USA

    Leonard Goldschmidt MD, PhD (Medical Director) (Medical Director)

  3. School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, 94720-2020, USA

    Jorge Cuadros OD, PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rudnisky, C.J., Tennant, M.T.S. (2006). Stereopsis in Teleophthalmology. In: Yogesan, K., Kumar, S., Goldschmidt, L., Cuadros, J. (eds) Teleophthalmology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33714-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33714-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24337-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33714-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation