Skip to main content

Reference Values of Semen Variables and Their Interpretation

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bonde JP, Ernst E, Jensen TK, Hjollund NH, Kolstad H, Henriksen TB, Scheike T, Giwercman A, Olsen J, Skakkebaek NE (1998) Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet 352:1172–1177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bostofte E, Bagger P, Michael A, Stakemann G (1990) Fertility prognosis for infertile men: results of follow-up study of semen analysis in infertilemen from two different populations evaluated by the Cox regression model. Fertil Steril 54: 1100–1106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JA, Wrixon W, Janes LB, Wilson EH (1983) Treatmentin-dependent pregnancy among infertile couples. N Engl J Med 309:1201–1206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comhaire FH, Kunnen M (1985) Factors affecting the probability of conception after treatment of subfertile men with varicocele by transcatheter embolization with Bucrylate. Fertil Steril 43:781–786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comhaire FH, Vermeulen L, Schoonjans F (1987) Reassessment of the accuracy of traditional sperm characteristics and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in estimating the fertilizing potential of human semen in vivo. Int J Androl 10:653–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comhaire FH, Rowe PJ, Farley TM (1988) How should we evaluate infertility in men and in women. Acta Clin Belg 43:78–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comhaire FH, Farley TMM, Rowe PJ (1992) Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in semen and other sperm characteristics: their relevance for fertility prediction in men with normal sperm concentration. Fertil Steril 6:877–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Keck C, Oberdieck U, Nieschlag E (1993) Effects of multiple ejaculations after extended periods of sexual abstinence on total, motile and normal sperm numbers, as well as accessory gland secretions, from healthy normal and oligozoospermic men. Hum Reprod 8:1251–1258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ducot B, Spira A, Feneux D, Jouannet P (1988) Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. II. Study of clinical characteristics-practical consequences. Int J Androl 11:395–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eimers JM, teVelde ER, Gerritse R, Vogelzang ET, Looman CW, Habbema JD (1994) The prediction of the chance to conceive in subfertile couples. Fertil Steril 61:44–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreave TB, Nillson S (1984) Seminology. In: Hargreave TB (eds) Male infertility. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYork, pp 56–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinting A, Comhaire F, Schoonjans F (1988) Capacity of objectively assessed sperm motility characteristics in differentiating between semen of fertile and subfertile men. Fertil Steril 50:635–639

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Homonnai ZT, Paz GF, Weiss JN, David MP (1980) Relation between semen quality and fate of pregnancy: retrospective study on 534 pregnancies. Int J Androl 3:574–584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leridon H (1980) The efficacy of natural insemination: a comparative standard for AID. In: David G, Price WS (eds) Human artificial insemination and semen preservation, Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar H, Sheps M (1970) Estimation of a type I geometric distribution from observations on conception types. Demography 7:349–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmar JL, Praiss DE, De Benedictis TJ (1979) An estimate of the fertility potential of the fractions of the split ejaculate in terms of the motile sperm count. Fertil Steril 32:202–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, Wetzels AM, Thomas CM, Merkus HM, Steegers-Theunissen RP (2001) Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 16:1165–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ombelet W, Bosmans E, Janssen M, Cox A, Vlasselaer J, Gyselaers W, Vandeput H, Gielen J, Pollet H, Maes M, Steeno O, Kruger T (1997) Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing. Hum Reprod 12:987–993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panidis DK, Rousso DH, Kourtis AI, Mavromatidis GA, Makedos GA, Kalahanis JA (2003) Prognostic value of evaluation of total number of morphological anomalies in 100 sperm in semen of infertile men. Arch Androl 49:351–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers BJ, Bentwood BJ, Van Campen H, Helmbrecht G, Soderdahl D, Hale RW(1983) Sperm morphology assessment as an indicator of human fertilizing capacity. J Androl 4:119–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer F, Seidel C, Mitchell R, Scharer K, Robertson WR (1991) Pulsatile immunoreactive and bioactive luteinizing hormone secretion in adolescents with chronic renal failure. The Cooperative Study Group on Pubertal Development in Chronic Renal Failure (CSPCRF). Pediatr Nephrol 5:566–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonjans F, Depuydt C, Comhaire F (1996) Presentation of receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) plots [letter]. Clin Chem 42:986–987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ, Spira A, Moscato ML, Jouannet P, Czyglik F, David G (1981) Study of a group of 484 fertile men. Part II: relation between age (20–59) and semen characteristics. Int J Androl 4:450–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Small DR, Collins JA, Wilson EH, Wrixon W (1987) Interpretation of semen analysis among infertile couples. CMAJ 136:829–833

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Chan SY, Ng M, So WW, Tsoi WL, Lo T, Leung A (1988) Diagnostic value of sperm function tests and routine semen analyses in fertile and infertile men. J Androl 9:384–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood C, BG, Trounson A (1984) Current status and future prospects. In: Wood C, Trounson A (eds) Clinical in vitro fertilization, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaini A, Jennings MG, Baker HW (1985) Are conventional sperm morphology and motility assessments of predictive value in subfertile men? Int J Androl 8:427–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Comhaire, F., Mahmoud, A. (2006). Reference Values of Semen Variables and Their Interpretation. In: Schill, WB., Comhaire, F., Hargreave, T.B. (eds) Andrology for the Clinician. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33713-X_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33713-X_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23171-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33713-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics